|
|
Lugdunum_RIC-This one corresponds to the aureus RIC64, but is not known to Sutherland.jmuona
|
|
Lugdunum_RIC1213,17 gr., max 18 mm, die-axis 4. Although anonymous, this is certainly a pro-Vitellian type. The mint is an educated guess. The RIC number refers to "Civil War" coins, not Vitellius.jmuona
|
|
Lugdunum_RIC50_512,76 gr., max 18 mm, die-axis 6.jmuona
|
|
Lugdunum_RIC543,50 gr., max 18 mm, die-axis 7.jmuona
|
|
Lugdunum_RIC563,41 gr., max 18 mm, die-axis 7.jmuona
|
|
Lugdunum_RIC593,42 gr., max 18 mm, die-axis 6.jmuona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rome_German_RIC773,09 gr., max 20 mm, die-axis 6.jmuona
|
|
|
|
|
Rome_Germ_RIC1033,22 gr., max 20 mm, die-axis 6.jmuona
|
|
|
|
|
Rome_Germ_RIC107This coin was cut for metal enrichment studies like the one in the Galba gallery.jmuona
|
|
Tarraco_Ric-BThis coin is close to being the denarius version of the aureus RIC1. The obverse legend is closer to type 2c, however. Again, not significant in my view and most likely struck with the same die as an aureus. This is one of those coins I just could not afford to keep. It was wonderful to observe that the new owner was from Spain. It went home.jmuona
|
|
Tarraco_RIC253,17 gr., max 20 mm, die-axis 6.jmuona
|
|
Tarraco_RIC363,48 gr., max 19 mm, die-axis 7.jmuona
|
|
Tarraco_RIC373,35 gr., max 19 mm, die-axis 6.jmuona
|
|
Tarraco_RIC63,32 gr., max 18 mm, die-axis 6. Strictly speaking this is not included in RIC, as the obverse legend is of RIC type 2b, not 2a. However, as this is only a question of the gap between the words VITELLIUS and IMP, I regard it as only a die variant.jmuona
|
|
|
|
|
