Roman Mint Style Examples
|
|
|
Antioch mint Portrait StyleFour coins from Anitoch mint. Typical 'hook-nosed' portraits.Mayadigger
|
|
Antioch vs. RomeOne way to distinguish Gordian's Antioch products from Rome is by letter shape, in particular, the letter M; on Antioch coins it is formed with a V in the middle thus IVI, whereas the Rome M is two lambdas thus Λ Λ. Joe Sermarini
|
|
Claudius Gothicus AE Antoninianus, Rome mintOBV: IMP CLAUDIUS AVG; Radiate head right
REV: SECURIT AVG; Securitas looking left, leaning on a column with legs crossed, baton in hand/ XI in field
Not listed in RIC , found in hoards (eg Cunettio 2228) and listed in Wildwinds as RIC V -I 101 Rome var.
The products of the Rome mint at this time have nearly vertical letter shapes eg 'M' is IIII, 'V' is almost II and 'A' appears like I-I or Hdaverino
|
|
Claudius Gothicus Antoninianus: Rome or Antioch? Curtis Clay posted on the discussion board: A. Markl, Mints and Issues of Claudius Gothicus (in German), Num. Zeitschrift 16, 1884, notes that Antioch and Rome share the same officina marks and some of the same rev. types, but the marked coins are easily separated, since Antioch always has obv. leg. IMP C CLAVDIVS AVG and officina letter IN EXERGUE, whereas Rome-mint coins with letters in exergue only began in Issue 3 with shortened obv. leg. IMP CLAVDIVS AVG.
Moreover Rome and only Rome usually writes IIIIIP for IMP in obv. leg. (your coin has more IVI for the M, which Markl says also occurs at Antioch).
Finally Antioch coins "are usually on nicely rounded flans and are struck in better billon than the antoniniani of other mints, and are also found more often with an intact silver coating."
Markl, a retired army officer, was a specialist collector of Claudius and the first man to clearly distinguish the different mints of the antoniniani and to put the production of each mint in approximate chronological order.Joe Sermarini
|
|
Constantine- Mint of Rome style!Very stern face, and distinctive nose are a dead give-away for Rome issues of Constantine and Licinius. The impressive cuirass is also quite common, while the drapery from Rome has a distinctive "flourish" to it. Very large bust...
From the Collection of Evan Rankin (Wolfgang336)wolfgang336
|
|
Constantius Gallus-MaiorinaThis is one of my coins that was mint in Sirmium. Coins mint in Sirmium are sharp, perfectly round, usually with great patina.
|
|
Elagabal mint of RomeElagabal AD 218-222
Denar RIC 88; C.61; BMC 212; rev. INVICTVS SACEDOS AVG
The star in the left field, a symbol of the sun-god, stands for the mint of Rome (Curtis Clay)Jochen
|
|
Fel Temp Reparatio Fallen HorsemanAlexandria
Amiens
Antioch
Aquileia
Arles
Constantinople
Cyzicus
Heraclea
Lyons
Nicomedia
Rome
Sirmium
Siscia
Thessalonica
Trier
Barbaous MintRandygeki(h2)
|
|
FEL TEMP REPARATIO from the Forvm CatalogRow 1 Fallen Horseman
Constantius II-Aquileia
Constantius II-Constantinople
Constantius II-Heraclea
Row 2Fallen Horseman
Constantius II-Arles
Constantius II-Thessalonica
Julian II-Sirmium
Julian II-Siscia
Constantius Gallus-Constantinople
Row 3 Barbarian Hut
Constans-Aquileia
Constans-Alexandria
Constantius II-Cyzicus
Row 4 Galley
Constantius II-Thessalonica
Constans-Siscia
Row 5 Galley
Constantius II-Thessalonica
Constantius II-Siscia
Constans-Siscia
Constans-Thessalonica
Row 6 Phoenix
Constantius II-Siscia
Constans-Siscia
Randygeki(h2)
|
|
Laodicea ad Mar, loop up from drapery on Julia Domna denariiLaodicea ad Mare is today Latakia, Syria. It was a Phonecian town, refounded by Seleucus I Nicator 301-281 B.C. and renamed after his mother, Laodicea. Coins of Julia Domna from the Laodicea mint can be identified by the loop coming up from her drapery at the neck.
|
|
Licinius II, Ae 3 Issues struck in AntiochThe portraits of Licinius II struck in Antioch are quite unusual and never to be confused with any other mint. Note the sharp nose and somewhat pinched features.Mayadigger
|
|
Licinius II, Ae 3 Issues struck in AntiochThe portraits of Licinius II struck in Antioch are quite unusual and never to be confused with any other mint. Note the sharp nose and somewhat pinched features.Mayadigger
|
|
Licinius II, Ae 3 Issues struck in AntiochThe portraits of Licinius II struck in Antioch are quite unusual and never to be confused with any other mint. Note the sharp nose and somewhat pinched features.Mayadigger
|
|
LRBC Antioch IssuesThe celators in Antioch had a unique and easily recognized portrait style; ie. hooked noses. On the other hand, each mint office had a different style for the same 'GLORIA EXERCITVS' Rev.Mayadigger
|
|
Philip I - Unknown Eastern Mint - SPES FELICITATIS ORBISRoman Empire
Emperor Philip I (244 - 249 AD)
Silver Antoninianus ( double denarius )
Struck at Unknown Eastern Mint - 244 AD.
obv: IMP C M IVL PHILIPPVS P F AVG PM - Radiate, draped & cuirassed bust right. Seen from behind.
rev: SPES FELICITATIS ORBIS - (translation: 'Hope for a Happy World') - Spes (Hope) advancing left, holding flower in one hand and lifting skirt with the other.
weight: 5.0 Grams
-----------------------------------------------------------
The extra obverse titles give away the fact that this was struck at the Unknown Eastern Mint, another obverse type has the 'PM', at the end of the obv titles on this example, underneath the bust of the Emperor on the Obverse.
One of three known reverse types struck at this Unknown Mint of the East of the Emperor Philip I. The other two are the ' PAX FUNDATA CUM PERSIS' - and 'VIRTUS EXERCITUS' reverses.
------------
Now, I know some other people on here have some other, and much nicer examples from this mint, and I would encourage them to post them in this 'Roman Mint Styles' Gallery.
Some people classify these coins as being from Antioch, here is an interesting link on that subject:
http://marchal.thibaut.free.fr/e_classification.htm
rexesq
|
|
Philip I - Unknown Eastern Mint - Virtus ExercitusUnknown Eastern Mint. Philip I - AR Antoninianus. 3.3 grams, flan crack.
obv: IMP C M IVL PHILIPPVS P F AVG PM - radiate, draped & cuirassed bust right. Seen from behind.
rev: VIRTVS EXERCITVS - Virtus standing right, holding spear & resting hand on shield.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The extra obverse titles give away the fact that this was struck at the Unknown Eastern Mint, another obverse type has the 'PM' underneath the bust of the Emperor on the Obverse.
One of three known reverse types struck at this Unknown Mint of the East of the Emperor Philip I. The other two are the ' PAX FUNDATA CUM PERSIS' - and 'SPES FELICITATIS ORBIS'
----------------
Now, I know some other people on here have some other, and much nicer examples from this mint, and I would encourage them to post them in this 'Roman Mint Styles' Gallery.
Some people classify these coins as being from Antioch, here is an interesting link:
http://marchal.thibaut.free.fr/e_classification.htmrexesq
|
|
Probus Stlyes Montagemaridvnvm posted this on the discussion board July 17, 2006:
One of my specialist areas is Probus and I thought I would share a little montage that I have put together. We must remember that stylistic changes occur within a mint over the time of a single emperor as well as between mints and it is often necessary to become as familiar as we can with these style differences to be able to determine the correct mint placement for some coins.
Here are some Bust Type Cs (Radiate, draped and cuirassed bust right (seen from the rear)) for arrange of mints under Probus including some examples from different periods of output from these mints where I have examples to show. I hope it is evident that there are marked differences to be seen between the mints but also within a single mint just for this short period of production. I have taken a random sample of coins and there are different styles notable between dies from the same period but they are all generally evident that they come from a particular mint at a particular period.
The output of Antioch and Tripolis are notably more crude and eccentric than the output of the other mints,
Similar stylistic differences can be seen for the other
Regards,
MartinJoe Sermarini
|
|
Tripolis mint Probus CLEMENTIA TEMP RIC 928Ant. IMP C MAVR PROBVS AVG, Radiate, draped and cuirassed bust R, seen from the back. CLEMENTIA TEMP, Probus receiving globe from Jupiter. Crescent in field, KA in exe. Tripolis, RIC 928, Common.
A good example of the Tripolis style for this emperor; it's quite distinctive, and quite naturalistic by comparison with other mints.Robert_Brenchley
|
|
URBS ROMA. Mint: CyzicusStruck A.D.331 under Constantine I.
Obverse: VRBS ROMA. Helmeted and plumed bust of Roma facing left.
Reverse: No legend. She-wolf standing facing left, suckling Romulus and Remus; above, two stars; in exergue, SMKΔ.
RIC VII : 91
VERY RARE*Alex
|
|
URBS ROMA. Mint: ThessalonikaStruck A.D.330 - 333 under Constantine I.
Obverse: VRBS ROMA. Helmeted and plumed bust of Roma facing left.
Reverse: No legend. She-wolf standing facing left, suckling Romulus and Remus; above, two stars; in exergue, SMTSA.
RIC VII : 187. *Alex
|
|
URBS ROMA. Mint: TreveriStruck A.D.332 - 333 under Constantine I.
Obverse: VRBS ROMA. Helmeted and plumed bust of Roma facing left.
Reverse: No legend. She-wolf, crescent symbol on shoulder, standing facing left, suckling Romulus and Remus; above, two stars; in exergue, TR•S.
RIC VII : 542
This coin is from the Grassmoor Hoard, Nottinghamshire, England.*Alex
|
|
Vespasian RIC 356 and RIC 1553AR denarius
Rome mint, 72-73 AD
RIC 356 (C3), BMC 64, RSC 45
And
Antioch mint, 72-73 AD
RIC 1553 (R3), BMC - , RSC - , RPC -
The first denarius is the common Rome mint example of the priestly implements type. The second coin is the same type struck at Antioch. Notice how the Antioch specimen has the trademark crude lettering style of that mint. Also, the second coin's portrait is reminiscent of contemporary tetradrachms struck in the 'Antioch' style.David Atherton
|
|
|
|
|
|
