I perfectly agree with
Curtis, but I didn't mean the highly skillful conservation
work proverbially done in
Switzerland (not confined to
Switzerland of course) which with respect, intelligence, high skill, and taste makes a nice big coin presentable. Such
work is expensive, and so the coin necessarily costs more and is more exhibitible (for my personal taste, some of them make the
field flatter than I'd like, but they don't ruin the coin). The 'toolies' we've been seeing, however, are crude and stupid and careless and uninformed, and the coins usually are utterly ruined. They are like the folk art of wooden cookie presses or abalone shell religious objects. When it happens to a
rare coin (and one that, being very fond of
sestertii and of early Septimius and of the legionaries, I'd love to own, even if worn to F or aF), I am really angry. Anyone who is actually fooled by that
eagle deserves to pay through the nose for it, but the engravers and even the
malleoli and the miners and the alloyers and
good old Septimius himself deserve not to be disrespected and despoiled.
Yes, of course conservators use
tools. How shall I put it? The guys producing the recent 'toolies' are
abusing their
tools, too. It's like using your camera and computer to send abroad crude porn. That is why I hate them worse than
fakes from scratch.
Pat L.