Thanks Jeff,
it looks to my eyes too as a barbarian version (Celtic ?), but I hope a genuine one ....
How can I contact Reid Goldsborough please?
Thanks
Antony
Looks
good to me,
good in the sense of authentic. It's in the right range for
weight and
diameter, and the
style is correct as well for these coins. It's very worn, of course, which though it hurts the coin's aesthetics is another factor that points to it being perfectly authentic. Finally, it's not a
cast of any of the common replicas, which forgers often, not always of course, use because they're less expensive to obtain. You'd need to have the coin in hand to know with relative certainty, but I believe from the picture that there's little doubt that it's not perfectly authentic.
I believe these coins are Thracian imitations of
Thasos tetradrchms, which I'm calling Thracian tetradrachms. You can find out more than you probably want to know about these coins at this site:
http://rg.ancients.info/thracetets