Classical Numismatics Discussion
  Welcome Guest. Please login or register. All Items Purchased From Forum Ancient Coins Are Guaranteed Authentic For Eternity!!! Explore Our Website And Find Joy In The History, Numismatics, Art, Mythology, And Geography Of Coins!!! Expert Authentication - Accurate Descriptions - Reasonable Prices - Coins From Under $10 To Museum Quality Rarities Welcome Guest. Please login or register. Internet challenged? We Are Happy To Take Your Order Over The Phone 252-646-1958 Explore Our Website And Find Joy In The History, Numismatics, Art, Mythology, And Geography Of Coins!!! Support Our Efforts To Serve The Classical Numismatics Community - Shop At Forum Ancient Coins

New & Reduced


Author Topic: COINS OF THE LAST 21 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE  (Read 13452 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
COINS OF THE LAST 21 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« on: December 21, 2009, 03:42:04 pm »
In Italian FAC was a discussion that aims to explain fully the coinage of the last 25 years of the Roman empire of Occident, in some cases revising some attributions and dating of RIC. At present, the debate has almost 90 posts.

https://www.forumancientcoins.com/board/index.php?topic=57859.0


PETRONIUS MAXIMUS

When March 15 in 455 Valentinian III was murdered by Shiite Optilia, who wanted to avenge the death of Aetius, the Senate immediately took the opportunity to crown one of its members, Flavius Petronius Maximus, scion of one of the oldest and most powerful families Roman, without awaiting action of older Marcian, emperor of the East, which was placed on the throne a character stronger and more capable.
Petronius Maximus is remembered as one of the most cowardly of all the imperial sequence. Crowned emperor on 17 March, the day immediately following the death of Valentinian III, had just time to coin a solid with his name in Rome and one in Ravenna (of Ravenna are known to only two examples), which already Geiseric was at the gates of Rome.
Petronius abandoned the city to its fate, fleeing with a group of senators. This took place on 31 May, after just two and a half months of bad governance. He was surprised, abandoned by his own Praetorian Guard, and stoned by the militia: his body, torn to pieces, was thrown into the Tiber.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2009, 03:43:48 pm »
AVITUS

In 425, when he was barely thirty, Avitus went to the court of Theodoric, king of the Visigoths, who kept one of his relatives as a hostage. On that occasion, between the sovereign and Avitus was born a mutual friendship which then remained even with the son of Theodoric, Theodoric II. After conducting a successful political career and held administrative positions of increasing importance, Avitus military career was started by the great general Flavius Aetius, following him in campaigns against Iutungi, Norica and Burgundians (430-436). Finally, in 437 he returned to his native Gaul as magister militum, where he defeated a band of Huns, and thanks to his friendship with Dietrich, first convinced him to withdraw from Narbonne which was besieged, and then to enter into an alliance with Romans (439).
He became prefect of Gaul but in 440 unexpectedly he retired to private life in his rich possessions of Clermont, while staying in a relationship of friendship, with Theodoric, and General Aetius.
This friendship made a fundamental double in 451, when Attila king of Hun invaded the Western Empire; then Avitus averaged between Theodoric and Aetius, getting that first joining forces with the Roman, which, under the joint command of Aetius and Theodoric defeated the Huns at the Battle of Chalons, where, however, the Visigoth king lost his life. To this succeeded by his son Thorismund, who did not share his father's policy of friendship with the Romans. The second son, also named Theodoric, friend of Avitus and supporter of maintaining the alliance with Rome, in 455 conspired against his brother and made him kill, being crowned as king from the Visigoths.
Avitus while carrying out his mission, came the news of the sack of Rome by the Vandals, led by Geiseric, and the death of Emperor Petronius Maximus. Gauls and Visigoths cheered together Avitus as the new emperor. Without waiting for confirmation of Marcianus and maybe even of the Roman Senate, Avitus immediately made a solidus and a tremissis at the mint of Arles (July-August 455), to force the consent of Rome.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2009, 03:44:32 pm »
Also Theodoric II coined its own currency on behalf of imitative Avitus. Then these two coins would be minted even before obtaining the ratification of the Roman Senate.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2009, 03:45:33 pm »
Then he walked to Italy accompanied by a Gaul-Visigoth army and when he was already on the move, September 21, came the ratification of the senators, and perhaps also to Marciano.
Early winter of 455 Avitus crossed the Alps and in December he came to Milan, where he coined the second copy of the gold coins of his reign, with emissions comparable to that of Arles. Then he reached Ravenna where he left a contingent under the command of visigoth Remistus, who had appointed magister militvm. There is a Tremissis attributed to Ravenna, the only issue of Ravenna, not reported by Ric and with uncertain attribution.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2009, 03:46:22 pm »
Perhaps Avitus settled in Rome in early 456 and that was when the roman Senate accepted it, because the emperor was accompanied by a rooster-Visigoth army.
Rome was very poor: after the sacking of Geiseric there remained no money. For this reason, solids and tremissis of Arles are not as rare as those of Rome. To coin money of bronze, however, Avitus melted some statues.
The Ric considers three bronze coins minted by Avitus: however one of them, the 2412, it looks false. This fact also raises doubts about the other two.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2009, 03:47:34 pm »
From an extensive analysis of several bronze coins attributed to Avitus appeared in major auctions, is evident that in none of them can read clearly the name of Avitus and that stylistically could perhaps be traceable to Valentinian III or to Honorius. Then there is the full assurance that there really bronze coins of Avitus.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2009, 03:49:34 pm »
Avitus faced the Vandals and defeated them earlier in Sicily and then in Corsica, but not end the supremacy of the Vandals in the western Mediterranean. The Roman Senate opposed Avitus, despite the successes achieved, not realizing the strategic importance of alliance with the Visigoths in a vision of great breath, and poorly tolerating the allocation of positions of importance to officials gauls. Thus was born a conspiracy to overthrow Avitus, captained by Mayorianus, backed by the Senate, and General Ricimer. Avitus, who had removed its forces in order to alleviate the demand of food in the capital, left Rome in the direction of Gaul, to reunite with his strength, but was defeated Piacenza (17 October 456). Avitus was killed in 457 while trying to escape to Gaul.

(to follow)


I apologize to you all for my bad English

Offline Jay GT4

  • Tribunus Plebis 2021
  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7003
  • Leave the gun, take the Canoli!
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #7 on: December 22, 2009, 06:36:45 pm »
Il tuo Inglese e piu meglio di mio Italiano!

Thanks!  Very interesting and informative.

Offline commodus

  • Tribunus Plebis Perpetuus
  • Deceased Member
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 3291
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #8 on: December 26, 2009, 09:14:05 pm »
Quote from: Jay (Titus Pullo) on December 22, 2009, 06:36:45 pm
I tuo Inglese e piu meglio di mio Italiano.

Mine too!
Yes, EXTREMELY interesting. Thank you, antvwala, for posting this data.
Eric Brock (1966 - 2011)

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #9 on: December 27, 2009, 03:27:30 pm »
Thanks to you, my friends!

Antvwala

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2009, 09:54:24 am »
MAJORIAN

Julius Valerius Maiorano was born about 420 and belonged to an ancient Roman family with great military traditions.
Marcian's successor, Leo I, before making a decision because now Ricimer is the true arbiter of the fate of the two empires. He is not the master, since the empire of the East is still a real force and the Emperor of Byzantium really governs. But the general Goth enjoys the favor of most of the army, and is also a skilled politician. A confrontation between the emperor of Constantinople and Ricimer could have an uncertain outcome, and would benefit other enemies of the empire.
Moreover Ricimer knows that would not be accepted as emperor of the West and therefore could rule Rome alone with a third party: a puppet emperor, who is not sure what she wants Leo I.
Marciano's successor, Leo I, hesitates before taking a decision because now Ricimer is the true arbiter of the fate of the two empires. He is not the master, since the empire of the East is still a real force and the Emperor of Byzantium really governs. But the general Goth enjoys the favor of most of the army, and is also a skilled politician. A confrontation between the emperor of Constantinople and Ricimer could have an uncertain outcome, and would benefit other enemies of the empire.
Moreover Ricimer knows that would not be accepted as emperor of the West and therefore could rule Rome alone with a third party: a puppet emperor, who is not sure what she wants Leo I.
On February 28, 457 Leo I appointed Magister militvm Majorian, as it was Ricimer, and it added the title of patricivs to Ricimer. But when, in March of that year a band of 900 Germans from escaping Rezia invaded the Po Valley, were the legions sent from Majorian to defeat it; those same legions on April 1, at Ravenna, Majorian proclaimed emperor of the West. Leo I, however, did not recognize the acclamation, fearful that it could break the delicate balance of power between Majorian and Ricimer.
Majorian immediately after the proclamation to emperor by the army, did coin a Tremissis, even before receiving confirmation of Leo I, which was probably very uncertain what to do. Again according to Kent, although a fait accompli eight months later, the emperor of Constantinople gave his approval, but still not pleased with the proclamation of Maiori.
Might therefore be reasonable to hypothesize the following sequence in the earliest issues of Ravenna:

1) Summer 457, emission Tremissis, without waiting for even the Senate nomination

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #11 on: December 28, 2009, 09:59:55 am »
2) Fall 457, emission the first type of solid with the two emperors and legend VOTIS MVLTIS having been ratified by the Senate, but not that of Leo I: having represented to the figure of Leo I might be a kind of olive branch toward the Byzantine emperor, Leo sits on the right and the left of Leon Majorian (ie looking at the right money) as a sign of respect and, to some extent, of subordination: an olive branch toward Leo I, to be forgiven for not having waited forcing his consent. Perhaps it goes back to the autumn of 457 the issue of an contorniatus (with the legend VOTIS MVLTIS?).

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #12 on: December 28, 2009, 10:03:54 am »
3) start of the 458, emission of the solid  of 2th type VICTORIA AVGGG, being Majorian become legitimate by Leo I. From the 458, but perhaps even later, was also launched in Ravenna production Nummi, in very limited quantities and for which he is known to three types: the first is a victory because you left, holding a crown laurel and a palm branch and in the second because we find the emperor ordered the front holding a spear and in the third emperor standing facing left dragging a prisoner by the hair. For all three types legend reads VICTORIA AVGG, it is possible that each type corresponds a different year of issue, but it seems more reasonable to think that the issuance of cease nummi bronze in Ravenna in late 458 or early of 459, if the production of the same brand in Milan.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #13 on: December 28, 2009, 10:08:31 am »
Indeed towards the end of 458 also becomes active mint in Milan, with the production of solids (such VICTORIA AVGGG) Tremissis and bronzes, including the type VICTORIA AVGGG, similar to the types of Ravenna. The production of gold coin in Milan is very limited and probably short-lived. It seems likely that since 459 acts as the mint of Ravenna mint comital for the production of solid and Tremissis, while that of Milan is concentrated in the production of bronze, which still remains a limited production.
Remains unexplained anomaly of non-use of the mint of Rome, which at the same time, instead of stamping coins with the monogram of Ricimer of doubtful legality. This begs the question what were the real balance of power between all stakeholders, Majorian, Ricimer, Leo I and the Senate.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #14 on: December 28, 2009, 10:15:09 am »
Consolidated its power in some way, or at least ensured a balance with Ricimer in historically turned its attention to the situation of decay in which he was the Western Roman Empire, Gaul also previously, albeit in the form of nation Federated, was still under the aegis of Rome. Indeed, with the death of Avitus, Theodoric II considered broken every covenant and, above all, of subordination to Rome. Continued with its policy of expansion and consolidation of the Visigothic nation, no longer in the name of Rome, but his own. As a sign of rejection of the new emperor, Theodoric continued to mint coins in the name of Avitus.

If Avitus had the dream, far-sighted but unrealistic, to give rise to a new Romano-Visigothic on the basis of mutual integration, Majorian, on the contrary, he wanted to bring back to be the situation as it gave the time of Theodosius I: barbarians allowed, but only as a federated, limiting their opportunities for "career" at military functions. In a sense, the position of Maiorano was as unrealistic as that of Avitus, even if he went in the opposite direction Ricimer, a Goth, was at the height of political power and was appointed by his patrician Leo I. Majorian's will to strengthen the Roman West, however, and its non-subordination to Ricimer, means that logically should be regarded as the true last emperor of the Roman Empire. The East, in fact, is now the Byzantine and Roman will have little daughters.
At the end of 458, Maiorano led his army in Gaul, occupying Arles and become the forum of his court and reopening of count with the mint coinage of solids and tremissis.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2009, 10:17:26 am »
Nepotianus was his magister militvm while Ricimer remained in Italy, excluded from any military operation: this is very significant as were the ratio of the Goth and Majorian. Theodoric II had to reach a compromise with the emperor of the West, accepting the authority and returned to the condition of Frederick; also had to give up the conquered regions after the death of Avitus, restoring in them the direct authority of Majorian. The changed situation is also reflected in Visigothic gold coins, now imitation of Majorian.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2009, 10:25:49 am »
So the army of Majorian, who was now joined that of Theodoric II, began the reconquest of that large part of the Iberian Peninsula occupied by vandals. Geiseric proposed a peace agreement that initially refused Maiorano; later, however, when roman fleet was destroyed by vandals, was compelled to reach an agreement that returned control to the empire on the Iberian peninsula, but the ownership does not recognize the vandals only of the Carthaginian, but also throughout the North Africa.
Meanwhile, in Rome Ricimer stayed to watch the culmination of events, and when Majorian was forced to reach an agreement with Geiseric, its credibility will be impaired and that was the patrician goth consequently strengthened.
Majorian attempted to gain the support of the Senate, restoring many of the traditional privileges that had been suppressed by Avitus. Confident of having the support, leave the army and from Arles, where he had returned, went to Rome. However in Tortona was arrested by order of Ricimer, order probably endorsed by Leo I, and a few days later, on 7 August 460, was beheaded and remained as the only Ricimer dominvs West.

Antvwala


PS) This is the abstract of the discussion is on FAC Italian:

https://www.forumancientcoins.com/board/index.php?topic=57859.0

Again I apologize for my bad English, and I thank those who want to correct it.


Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2010, 04:37:38 pm »
Ricimer, the Suebian who wanted to be emperor

During Theodosius I, the characters of barbarian origin but of great ability, assumed important roles in the management of res militaria empire. But with Valentinian III, their importance grew dramatically, until they became the real arbiters of Rome.
Etius was first, and then came Ricimer, true arbiter of the West, and to some extent, also the Orient.
If Avitus could be first ousted and then killed by treachery, it is because Marcianus wanted him, but because Ricimer allows. It 'just, therefore, to ask what were the motives Ricimer to stab behind him who had elevated to the rank of magister militvm.
The ambition is always the key to spring the great majority of men.
Avitus had a strategic plan in which Theodoric II and the Visigoths had a central role, perhaps that was precisely what he could not pleasure or a Marcianus or mainly Ricimer, aware that in a hypothetical federation "Roman-Visigoth" the role of visible head of the empire would certainly remained at Avitus, but to strong arm was at Theodoric II, and same Ricimer  would become of secondary importance. Instead ousting Avitus, Ricimer got the best result possible: he be the sole operator of the destinies of the Western Empire.

Understanding Ricimer helps put in perspective this quarter century, and beyond. While Ricimer is driven by the largest possible ambitions, are of the imperial purple, although its behavior is strongly motivated by resentment and 'conscious of his great military capacity, and even politics, but too often felt misunderstood in its value for his source barbaric.
Leo I probably would have liked to crown him emperor and the title of patricivs could be the first step. But who was opposed to this project hardware stores, was the Pope Leo the Great, first  sponsor of Mayorianus, that on more than one occasion humiliated publicly the Germanic general, Suebian for father and grandson of the Visigothic king Wallia but my mother's side. The Senate tolerated and certainly more of a senator flattered him, but knew perfectly Ricimer to be scorned because of its origin.
The only one that surely does not contempt, but on the contrary, he fully appreciated its merits, was Avitus, who in fact made him magister militvm. But in the draft Avitus of integration between the Romans and Visigoths, Ricimer would remain excluded from this political role of arbiter of the empire to which aspired. From there his betrayal.

In 457 Ricimer tolerate being elected emperor Mayorianus, but in 461 he does kill him and replace it with Libius Severus. In fact, after the death of Mayorianus, Ricimer decided to put on the imperial throne someone who claimed to be able to manipulate at will, and chose Senator Libius Severus, who had no merit. The new emperor, however, he faced the disapproval of Leo I. Libius Severus was not even recognized by any of the partners' military Mayorianus, neither by Egidius in Gaul (which he also aspired to the purple), nor by Marcellinus in Sicily and Illyria, nor Nepotianus from Hispania. It 'very significant that Ricimer now considers that it no longer needs the support of the court of Constantinople.
In 465 Ricimer perhaps put to death the emperor Libius Severus (it is suspected that he had poisoned) and ruled for eight months. Eventually, however, had to accept Anthemius (chosen by Leo I), whose daughter married diplomatically Alipia.
In 468 Ricimer commanded the Roman army in an expedition organized by Leo I against the Vandals of Geiseric: the expedition, however, failed. Ricimer was accused plotting for this to happen.
Four years later, Ricimer moved to Mediolanum, ready to wage war against Anthemius. St. Epiphanius, bishop of Pavia, he secured a truce, which, however, was shortlived, and soon after Ricimer appeared before Rome with an army of Germans proclaimed emperor Olybrius, candidate supported earlier by Genserico. In July 472  Ricimer defeated Anthemius, who was killed.
During the civil war Rome was sacked again (third sack of Rome). Ricimer died a few weeks later. Even Olybrius died and was succeeded in 473 Glycerius. However, less than two months after Ricimer died of fever and the title was taken by his nephew Patrick Gundobaldo.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2010, 04:38:22 pm »
Being able to wear the imperial purple was the dream constant of Ricimer, but as in decline, the Roman Senate, in fact the only institution to survive, was not available to proclaimed emperor a German as he was. Could accept that his power was such, provided that it complied with the formal aspect.
That ambition, however Suebian found space in the bronze coinage of the mint of Rome, which he secured possession and management almost exclusively.
It 'very interesting but difficult to interpret, the presence of a nummi (E4) with the bust on the obverse and the legend of FL RECI[MER]VS [...] and to the reverse the traditional won the crown and the legend VICT / AVG, which hint Biraghi & Lacam (1984, 409). That being the only coin minted in the name of formally Ricimer.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2010, 04:38:58 pm »
There are, however, where some nummi where Ricimer appears with his monogram on the reverse. In the case of emissions Libius Severus, they are the "normalcy" in the production of nummi, even a normal from an institutional absolutely shocking. However emissions Libius Severus were preceded by one and followed by another two in which, quite unexpectedly, it appears the monogram Ricimer. They come from the treasury of Falerii Novi, unearthed in the late nineteenth century, but critically scrutinized by only a few years thanks to the masterly work of Michael Asolati.

In the treasury of Falerii Novi, there are 900 nummi clearly legible of fifth century, distributed as follows:
Honorius, Theodosius II, Valentinian III: 108
Marcianus: 23
Mayorianus: 15
Leo I: 60
Valentinian III with monogram Ricimer: 3
Libius Severus: 293
anepigraphic with monogram Ricimer: 1
Anthemius with the monogram of Ricimer: 1
Anthemius: 396

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #20 on: January 21, 2010, 04:40:52 pm »
To precede the emission of Libius Severus, there one in that it appears on the obverse a bust of Valentinian III and the legend DNPLAVALENTINIANVS ... and on the reverse the monogram of Ricimer, similar to the emission Libius Severus, but almost certainly coincide with the government Mayorianus, in clear controversy with the same because, in fact, constitute a repudiation. This coin may have been coined after the appointment of Ricimer which patricivs (February 28, 457), but before accepting the appointment of Mayorianus by Leo I, beginning of 458. This issue could be then, the evidence of the fierce struggle Ricimer and Mayorianus for the imperial purple, and, perhaps, may have accelerated the initiative Mayorianus to deliver its first solid without waiting for confirmation of Leo I of his coronation. Michael Asolati, attributed this emission to the period 457-461, emphasizing its importance as it represents "the first completely independent release in Italy of an authority other than the imperial, well above that of Odoacer and those of the Gothic kings." This issue is present in the treasury of Falerii Novi with three specimens (No. 549, 550 and 551), apparently all from the same dies.

There are other two issues certainly subsequent to the Libius Severo, each represented by a single copy.
In the first of them (No. 845), the obverse shows an anepigraphic bust and toward the monogram Ricimer, probably due to the period between the death of Libius Severus (25 September 465) and the Coronation of Anthemius (25 March 467 ).
In the second (No. 846), the obverse is the bust of Antemius with the legend  [...]NTEM[...] and the reverse is the monogram of Ricimer. It seems reasonable to attribute this nummi to the period immediately following the coronation of Anthemius, perhaps during the marriage between Ricimer and Alipio the young daughter of Anthemius, who had a very short duration.

Of course none of these coins was known by the authors of RIC, as they were published only in 2005

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #21 on: February 03, 2010, 06:06:55 am »
Libius Severus, the emperor None

The Lucan Libius Severus Serpentius when he circled the wreath Imperial he was a senator 41 years old deeply religious and spiritual, peaceful and alien of all conflict.
After several appointments imposed by the military, subsequently enshrined in the Senate, faced with a fait accompli, in the case of Libius Severus, at least formally, was the role of the most respected Roman forum. In fact, just over three months after the death of emperor Mayorianus (7 August 461), Roman Senate  gathered solemnly in Ravenna on November 19, 461, the rich patrician Lucan Libius Severus. Three months full of pressures. Leo I, increasingly intolerant of "protection" of Aspar, he wanted to settle Anthemius, son-in-law of Marcianus as Marcellinus, magister militvm Illyricum; Egidio, magister militvm of Gaul, was extremely disappointed by the strengthening of Ricimer power, so that elected Libius Severus, was prepared to intervene militarily in Italy, but was deterred by the war against the Visigoths; Theodoric II, king of the Visigoths, had wanted a weak emperor, yes, but not linked to Suebian Ricimer, with whom the Visigoths were in constant war; the Vandal Geiseric, finally, he wanted to impose his own candidate in the shape of Olybrius, married Placidia, daughter of Valentinian III, by the time of the sack of Rome (455) lived at his court in Carthage. Perhaps the same Ricimer dreamed to crown himself the imperial purple, but he was conscious that he was acquiescing to his will, the Roman Senate would never have agreed to have a barbarian as emperor.
The election of Libius Severus, therefore, put an end to three months of strong contrasts and seemed to assure Ricimer maximum power.

From the numismatic point of view, the coronation of Libius Severus was accompanied by an Ravenna’s emission really great. Was coined a multiple of 12 solid with on the reverse a complex scene inspired to Pietas Avg, in which the emperor standing, crowned with victory, extends his right hand to the embodiment of towered Italy, which is presented by a helmeted figure (Ric 2701); from the Valentinian III time, is the first time again is coined a multiple gold. To it was added a solid, with traditional iconography, where the emperor standing with crossed scepter and globe surmounted by Victory and the legend Victoria Avggg (Ric 2702). To underline the fact that the iconography of this original issue, as is that of subsequent releases, it contains no reference to the "pars Orientis" and not search the consent of Leo I.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #22 on: February 03, 2010, 06:13:13 am »
Issue commemorating the coronation, followed by a grand Roman emission, extended to a wide range of nominal, minted from 462. The solidos is represented by two types of obverse, facing right and clamys dress (Ric 2704-06), as in the issuance of the coronation, or turning left and a military dress (Ric 2703): on reverse, the iconography is the same of solid issued for the coronation: the emperor standing facing left or front, crushing a snake-headed anthropomorphic. The issue is completed by the golden semis with Christogram in a laurel wreath and the legend around Salvs Reipvblicae (Ric 2707-08) and an anepigraph tremissis with the cross in a crown of laurel (Ric 2709-10).


Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #23 on: February 03, 2010, 06:57:27 am »
Roman issue is completed even by silver nominally, siliqua and half siliqua, and two bronze Nummus. The siliqua (Ric 2711) to submit to the usual pattern with Roma enthroned facing left holding a globe surmounted by Victory and the legend, abnormal Vrbis Rome. In the half siliqua, anepigraphic, seems a Chi-Rho in a laurel wreath (Ric 2712-13).
There are, finally, two nummus E4. The first, presumably coined in the late 461 or early 462, incorporates the theme of victory going to the left, with wreath and palm branch (Ric 2714) and legend Victo Avg: it was coined in very small amounts. In the second nummi instead, on the verse appears the monogram of Ricimer, which initially occupies the entire field and is inserted into a pearl crown almost constantly out of flan (2716 Ric B), and following it is reduced slightly in size and inserted into a laurel wreath: as in the previous case, remains outside the flan (Ric 2715 and 2717). Coinage, in fact, has a dimension E3, or at least much greater than that of AE4 flan.
The decision to issue a nummus with the monogram of Ricimer matched the portrait of Severus Libius is striking: while it shows a willingness to Ricimer to highlight the supervision exercised over Libius Severus, on the other hand is an issue of fact issued in his own name by the magister militvm, diminishes the credibility of imperial authority and anticipating the release of Odoacer, which corresponds to the first coin issued in Italy by a local not imperial authority. This nummus with the monogram of Ricimer was coined on several occasions, as evidenced by the numerous variations, and in large quantities: in fact its spread went beyond the geographical borders of Italy. The fact that it appears unusual is due solely to the minimal size that compromises the shelf over time.

Offline antvwala

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 7199
Re: COINS OF THE LAST 25 YEARS OF LIFE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE
« Reply #24 on: February 03, 2010, 06:59:59 am »
Alongside the release of Rome, there were those of Ravenna and Milan. That Ravenna is only represented by a solidus type Avggg Victoria (Ric 2718-19), similar to that of the release of count. The issue is more complex in Milan as well as the solidus (Ric 2720-25), similar to that Comitatenses, it also emits a Tremissis (Ric 2726-28) similar to that of the release of Rome.


 

All coins are guaranteed for eternity