From a practical/technical point of view,
Curtis is right in stating that, when looking at previous and later issues with the exact, or parallel (seated) depiction, the
Romans themselves deigned it worthy of
Salus.
Patricia, on the other hand, from the historical point of view, rests her case in the fixed attributes and says that the rudder can solely belong to
Fortuna and that the depiction should therefore BE
Fortuna. Yet she points to the fact that 'cross-over' deities and
personifications did occurr.
The symbiosis of the Eastern and Western deities/gods/cults
had, mid second century, been accepted throughout the Empire; only to be renewed in the third century by the upcoming Gallic/Germanic local deities, as a result of the increasing number of those kinsmen in the
Roman army.
I think we have here a
good mixture of two
personifications. For the common
Roman people, the attributes the nice-looking
men and women bore with them, were leading as to whom the effigies represented.
The celators would well have thought over how to attire this woman and they came up with this.
' To the
health and
good fortune of the state/emperor.'
The common people could have seen this as a combined effort of two
personifications and hence doubly important.
I
hope that while
Patricia stuck out her neck, I am not talking throught the back of it.
Frans
PS
Googeling at 'Salus, rudder, snake' I found out that the rudder is definitely
part of her attributes; her festival is on March 30th, by the way, Let's honour her for all our
health and prosperity!
Ave
FD