It is at 100 % the same coin.
On both picture there is a black spot right to the mouth and chin, the chance to find two coins with this black spot at same position from same dies and same die state with same
flan shape, centering, waer etc. is zero.
Especially if both coins do have the same
flan shape and same characteristics from striking (edge breaks, centering and from same very late and worn out dies) and same indvidual characteristics from wear (no wear visible) and from environment (black spot and on the
reverse seems to be some orange/brown
toning possibly from sulfor).
You can see that one of the coin is darker in pictures, which proves different lumination level.
And different lumination level means different contrast, because a darker lumination means more contrast.
You would not believe how difficult one and the same coin can look in different pictures especially small and low resolution low
quality pictures !!!!!
I have made already bad experiences with this several time that coins from
ebay or
auctions looked different in hand or in my pictures with bright lumination you can make problems vanish and if you play with contrast and brightness you can pronounce details and let them look stronger than they really are.
Two so identical coins could not exist if so at least one of them must be fake if not both.
But
cast fakes will always look a little
bit different than the mother due to detail loss and transfer errors,
And even
cast fakes from the same mould will look always a little
bit different as mentioned abouve hole from air bibbles at different location, pearls/knots a different location and not identical casting defects.
And of course two or more identical looking coins will rise suspiciouns so forgerys will try to make them look different.
For example applying scratches to distract, by appling different articicial tonings, adding bankers marks or
test cuts, adding encrustrations, harshly cleaning to damage surface, modify the mould to add or removed details and to modify the
flan shape ...