Hi
Robert,
I read your draft paper with interest and would like to offer some random comments.
(1) You don’t reference the existing literature about the
Thessalonica mint at this period. The most detailed discussion is in David
Metcalf’s monograph
The Copper Coinage of Thessalonica under Justinian I,
Vienna 1976. You may have trouble finding this text – it’s very
scarce. I
had to consult the copy from the
RNS library in
London, even though I live in Manchester 200 miles away. Also very important are the various discussions in the works of
Hahn, most recently
MIBE, page 64f. If you disagree with
Metcalf and/or
Hahn you will have to explain why you think they are wrong.
(2) Rather than being
part of an important trade route between
west and east,
Metcalf argued for a growing isolation of
Macedonia from the rest of the empire. The Illyricum prefecture did not concern itself with
Italy or the Goths much at this time – it was far more alarmed about incursions by Bulgars and Slavs.
Sirmium was lost to the Gepids in 536. If this picture is correct, an explanation for the distinctive
denominations used in
Thessalonica related to Justinian’s
Gothic wars would seem to be less likely.
(3)
Hahn suggested that the peculiar Thessalonican system was a result of the currency reform of 538, under which the gold-copper conversion
price was altered from 20lb to 16lb = 1
solidus. Thus, before the reform a
solidus was worth 360 folles of nominal
weight 18 to the pound, after the reform 210 folles struck at 13¼ to the pound.
Hahn suggested that
Thessalonica kept to the old
standard. By keeping 720 half-folles to the
solidus the
mint was obliged to issue “half-folles” of only 16-nummi. It’s interesting that when the
Thessalonica mint starts issuing 20-nummi and 10-nummi pieces in 562, they seem to have the same
weight standard as the earlier 16- and 8-nummi pieces. But the metrology really isn’t all that clear, because lots of the earlier series coins have
weights significantly lighter than
Hahn’s theory would predict.
(4) The A – P letters are
still an unsolved problem. And, of course,
types also exist which have AISPI (
SBCV 186) and
APISΨ (
SBCV 183). Perhaps the extra I could indicate Illyrica, particularly if the A – P stand for ‘Arca Praefectoria’.
APISΨ is harder to fathom, but if
Hahn’s old
weight standard conjecture is correct then maybe it could be a kind of designator of that: Ψ as a numeral is 700.
Keep researching!
Bill R.