Hi,
first, all my publicly available papers can be obtained from Rsearch Gate as pdfs. As to the main
Otho things, the one with Matthew Ponting and Kevin
Butcher is in Forum's resource
library, the
Otho die-study will be there once Joe has the opportunity to put it there. I cannot figure out how to do it and he does have some other things in mind as well - like how to earn
his living!
I suspect the coin in question - and the one I saw in NAC
London office - are 19th Century
forgeries meant to decieve collectors. As I have not
had this in hand, I cannot be sure, but it is definitely different from all the 120+
aurei of
Otho I have seen images of. Personally I have handled some 40 of those.
Aurei and
denarii of the time were minted with the same dies, so not to have a single one with "PP" on them after seeing 1700 is suspicious already and combining that with the "new"modified SECVRITAS
reverse - why would she have
cornucopia - is a
bit too much already. There are even other factors to consider.
One can of course postulate an additional
mint - this is what the eminent Mr.
Russo did - but there is no other evidence for this and historically speaking the location could only be in the East and that is out of question. The
obverse is very much
Roman, the die unknown previously.
In my view the
Nero looks a
bit off as well, the
Greeks I am not qualified to comment upon.
s.
Jyrki Muona