Ave!
Note and compare the following two photos -
The 1st is courtesy of a serious collector friend of ours. The 2nd is ours.
I have always
had a problem with such S-shaped buckle connectors. If they were not directly attached to the belt in one manner or another, they would have immediately become lost. Does that make sense?
As seen in our example, the S-shaped connector has a
bar at each end with residual rusting from two iron pins. These pins could have attached the connector to one end of the belt, close enough to be attached snug to the other similar buckle.
My new theory...
Any thoughts?
Kevin