Hi Optimus and the other participants!
This is an interesting discussion. Of course, artistic value and
rarity have to be in some balance. One coin of my dreams would be a decadrachm from
Syracuse. They're not really
rare but classical Greek art at its climax, and one day I'll have to have one.
What Optimus says about
Byzantine coins is, of course, heretic, and he'll have to burn at the stake for it
. But each time I try to really get involved with these, I can't
help sharing this opinion. It's
good to have a few coins (I was just lucky last week to get one of those nice 40mm folles of Justinian at a
good price) but it will never be my main realm of collecting. It's too formalized (if I
met Trajan in the street I'd know
his face, but Justinian??), and I see no point in counting whether the
loros has four or five dots.
Rarity, however, is a thing that has always fascinated me. To know that there are only a couple of coins of a special
type, or to even have a possibly unique coin, is a real thrill to me. And this is where I have to choose between
rarity and condition: If I decide not to buy an extremely
rare coin and wait to get it in a better grade, either I could buy one or two coins a year, which would not satisfy me, or I might wait forever to get a nicer specimen (or I find one but can't afford it). Of course, I understand now more than when I was younger that
rarity isn't all, and that I have to take care not to pay too much for
rare coins in low grade, or I wouldn't see my
money again when I might sell them some day. I'll enclose a picture of the same coin
type and same
obv. die as above from
Coinarchives, much nicer than mine. This one fetched $1,900, so since I paid less than 10 percent of this for my specimen, I think it's definitely worth that much for the
rarity (besides, mine isn't too bad, not a slug).
Rupert