>
but the plumes of the helmet are of equal length on my coinDifferences in such relatively minor details on late
Roman and
Byzantine coins are,
as djmacdo says, quite common and have no influence on the
identification of the coin.
Such coins were often struck from a large number of different dies, which broke,
cracked, got stolen or lost, so
had to be replaced by new dies usually
engraved by
different engravers whose interpretation differed from others.
Important differences on such a coin would be if the IQ-cross over M over
officina letter
in the left and right fields
had their positions reversed, or the plume
had been omitted.
I often receive coin images by email for
identification, for which the owner, usually a
new collector, is convinced that
his or her coin is unique because the position of the
diadem ties on, for example, a common coin of
Constantius II, fall in a different way,
or a
VOT wreath has 2 more leaves.
It is quite a common error which new collectors make, being used, as they are, to
current modern coins, which are generally identical except for the date.