It is completetly impossible that E + D + F are from same transfer dies.
Becasue each of them has details which are missing on the other 2 of them.
One giveway of transfer die
fakes is generally that they have no new which are not already present on the mother and details missing ont he mother will be so missing on them too except details are recut (but it is impossible to perfectly recut details so this new details will be different than in the ancient dies and so different as on authentic coins).
If I make out of E + D a transfer die and recut there the letters that they are so
sharp and fresh this transfer die can be only used for F, because E+D have worn letters (flow lines eroded in the dies).
If you use D to make a transfer die and recut many details perfectly to produce E, then this transfer die will have like D+E worn letters and can not be used to strike F, this letters can not be recut later in dies, such details must be modified in silicon rubber (rubbre will be made later with graphit electric conductive to procude die with electroplating).
If you use E to make a transfer die and recut many details perfectly to produce E, then this transfer die will have like D+E worn letters and can not be used to strike F, this letters can not be recut later in dies, such details must be modified in silicon rubber (rubbre will be made later with graphit electric conductive to procude die with electroplating).
Why can this letters can not be recut later in dies?
It is easy, die wear means the die is losing metal due to erosion from metal flow and there is possibly some abrasion/rubbing from striking between
planchet and matrixes even if the
planchet is heated.
If you want to remove die wear you would have to add melted metal and then you would have to recut details.
And adding meltel metal is not always
good the high temperature and later cooling can cause problems (tension) to the dies if there are already die breaks the can become stronger and even the die can break.
Cutting details in dies means that you will remove metal!
It is of course possible to recut the letters without adding metal, but this recutting would result in much huger letters becasue this letters must be huge enough to cover the flow lines (die wear).
F is from an earlier die state, no die wear see the completely fresh letter, E+D are from later die state see the die wear on letter (metal flow near letter is called flow lines and this metal flow will erode with time in the dies)
E has details missing on D + F.
D has missing Detatils missing on E + F
F has details missing on E + D
F has completely fresh letters meaning the dies must have been very fresh when this coin was struck.
Of course Details like letters can be recut in treansfer dies.
It has parts of dotted
border missing on D (10-11 o´clock) + details that are missing on E due to this scuff (
shield, wing + C + groundline)
IF F is supposed to be the mother of D + E then the letters must have been worn down artificially in transfer dies not sure if it is possible and many details must have been recut in transfer dies which are missing or on F and that are present or sharper on E + D
If E or D is supposed to be the mother F there must have been massive recutting of details.
E + D are from the same late die state which can be easily recoginzed if you compare the die wear of the letters which is identical so same die state.
The die wear is actually here metal flow (flow lines), which eroded in the dies with time and so this flow lines are indentical on coins from same die state.
IF E is supposed to be the mother of D then in the transfer dies the dotted
border from (10-11 o´clock) must have been recut.
Because this dotted
border is present/visible on D the suppose transfer die
fake but not the mother E so it must have beenr recut.
If a
part of the dotted
border is recut, then we would have to ask why there other parts of dotted
border were not recut.
To recut dooted
border perfectly is pretty much impossible so if dotted
border on D is idnetical as on authentic coins it can not be recut and is so authentic.
The dotted
border does not look recut but a die study would
help to reconstruct which details were in the ancient dies at which die state and which details present on transfer die
fakes are individual characteristics (from striking, wear and environment) from the mother and should not be found indentical on another coin from the same dies.
If D is supposed to be the mother of E then the details missing due to wear and scuffs must have been recut and dots of dotted
border.
And as we know perfect recutting is pretty much impossible and if the details like hair, dotted
border,
shield, wing + C + groundline are indentical as on authentic coins (same die state) then this details can not be recut.