Well spotted! You are correct; the image is that of a
distaff, not a
cornucopiae.
So an errant description in
Weber, and we'll have to reference this one as
Weber I #663
corr. (
distaff misdescribed as
cornucopiae).
That's surprising, since the next coin (#664, no photo) is described as having a
distaff, so you'd think the immediate juxtaposition would
help sort that out. I do not believe the descriptions were reversed.
I added a higher-resolution image of just the one coin, #663, to my earlier post. Perhaps some more eyes would
help.