Help Caracalla Denarius

[Tanit]

Hi

Here is a Caracalla denarius  with the reverse legend: PM TRP XIIII COS III PP. It is RIC 187 C (common).
However, I can't find it anywhere: neither on acsearch, nor Coinarchives, nor Wildwinds....
On the Internet, only OCRE mentions it:

http://numismatics.org/ocre/results?q=Caracalla+RIC+187

So should we consider this denarius as common because the RIC says so or as rare because it cannot be found on the market.

Thanks

[shanxi]

 There are several on acsearch:

Some examples

https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=702899
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=2712182
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=411433
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=2966075


The problem is that there are some pearls, especially on the reverse, e.g. at the P of P M, at the end of the drapery, or in the right field.
But maybe I just see fakes everywhere again. 

[Pekka K]

Maybe rarity on RIC was based on Reka Devnia hoard, where 119 coins:

[Tanit]

There are several on acsearch:

Some examples

https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=702899
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=2712182
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=411433
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=2966075

I don't know whether to learn to do the research on acsearch or to change my glasses 

[maridvnvm]

The coins cited in RD by Pekka K are the PONTIF version not the P M version of this coin.

I must admit that I had the same alarm bells ringing as mentioned by shanxi about the surfaces.

[Tanit]

The problem is that there are some pearls, especially on the reverse, e.g. at the P of P M, at the end of the drapery, or in the right field.
But maybe I just see fakes everywhere again. 

I think it's due to artificial light

[Ron C2]

The bright spot at 9 on the reverse looks suspicious, along with the overall impression of the coin. Do you have a good macro shot of the edge? Or a nice close-up shot of the area I mentioned that looks suspiciously like a sprue site?

[Tanit]

I believe you are right: it seems to be fake.