FORVM`s Classical Numismatics Discussion Board

Resources => Fake Coins and Notorious Fake Sellers => Topic started by: Mark Z on February 03, 2013, 12:45:11 pm

Title: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on February 03, 2013, 12:45:11 pm
Hello Friends!

I just wanted to update the board on the latest listings by NSFL member "numis18" of fleabay infamy.

Here are his latest offerings.

I will be happy to post any and all in the Fakes Reports that are deemed fakes by the FORVM experts.

Regards,
mz

p.s. Here the first five. Five more to follow.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on February 03, 2013, 12:47:05 pm
Next five:

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Joe Sermarini on February 03, 2013, 11:26:10 pm
Fake coin reports please.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Cliff on February 04, 2013, 09:16:20 am
Deeply tooled.
But not fakes.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Joe Sermarini on February 04, 2013, 12:55:24 pm
I believe I have seen in-hand some coins from the same maker.  They were not just tooled, they were cast fakes.  In any case, even if these were once genuine, they are certainly now fakes.  The are not worthy of any collection. 
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Cliff on February 05, 2013, 12:37:45 pm
The are not worthy of any collection. 

I agree!  >:(
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on February 05, 2013, 09:50:40 pm
Here are a couple more that posted in the last 24 hours or so.

Also, here is some potentially helpful info for the NSFL list from a negative feedback left for him:

"numis18 = johan2850 = ardenias21"

Neither of those other names are on the list yet.

Regards,
mz

p.s. fake coin reports have been posted.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on February 14, 2013, 10:36:51 am
The latest listing by "numis18" ending in a few days:

Hadrian Sestertius

Fake Report added.

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on February 17, 2013, 12:48:46 pm
...and another:

Trajan Sestertius.

Fake report added.

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on February 17, 2013, 12:54:32 pm
...and yet another that just popped up this morning:

Marcus Aurelius Sestertius.

Fake Report added.

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on February 17, 2013, 12:58:23 pm
Just pulled out my calculator.

Over the past 15 days, this snake has raked in over $2600 USD.

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on February 24, 2013, 01:01:41 am
The latest offering from "numis18" on fleabay:

Sabina, wife of Hadrian AE Sestertius.

Looks pretty bad but once again I defer to our experts for verification of fakery.

I will then post a fake report.

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on March 12, 2013, 01:34:43 am
It's been a while but here is the latest offering from "numis18" of fleaBay infamy:

Trajan sestertius.

If you scroll back up a little you will see a similar sestertius with what looks like the same portrait.

Fake Report added.

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: areich on March 12, 2013, 04:50:00 am
I would be very happy to know for certain that all of these are tooled modern fakes. I can't feel much compassion for people who spend this kind of money without educating themselves first but I am sad and angry to see decent coins tooled.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: R. Smits on March 12, 2013, 10:57:45 am
Some of these coins look very convincing. I understand why people buy these for real. Sad story indeed. And filing a complaint to EB is not helping either. They cash for every sold item... Who's to blame ?
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on March 12, 2013, 03:30:12 pm
Something that is really amazing to see is when he has several listings at once: the uniformity of the patinas should sound some alarms for even the newest of collectors but I guess I'm wrong.

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Marti Vltori on March 12, 2013, 08:03:01 pm
Something that is really amazing to see is when he has several listings at once: the uniformity of the patinas should sound some alarms for even the newest of collectors but I guess I'm wrong.

Regards,
mz

Exactly what i was thinking. Not only the uniformity of the patina but the details also. No worn spots just equal strike all over. If I saw one of these coins it would make me pause. Seeing them all together is a dead give away.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on March 18, 2013, 01:09:55 am
This guy is prolific if nothing else:

Trajan Sestertius.

Fake Report added.

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: glebe on March 19, 2013, 08:18:26 pm
I'm intrigued by these coins.
They do seem to be repatinated, and in amazing condition, so we conclude that they have presumably been tooled.
But if so it has been done amazingly well, and apart from the almost unworn condition and the repatination what is there that suggests reworking? Perhaps some experts in these types can assist me.

Ross G.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Robert_Brenchley on March 20, 2013, 04:29:12 pm
The style of the carving isn't right. It's more blocky than a genuine example would be.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: areich on March 21, 2013, 12:13:48 am
Compare with genuine examples. Most of them are very obviously tooled. If it's not clear from looking at them, it becomes clear by comparing with genuine, untooled coins. Toolers very often get the hair and folds of garments wrong.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: glebe on March 21, 2013, 02:46:56 am

Compare with genuine examples.
 
I've done that.

Most of them are very obviously tooled.

Not to me.

If it's not clear from looking at them, it becomes clear by comparing with genuine, untooled coins. Toolers very often get the hair and folds of garments wrong.

The hair and garments on all of these coins that I have checked are impeccable.


There are however a couple of somewhat suspect features on some these coins - can anyone spot them?

Ross G.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Arados on March 21, 2013, 05:56:53 am
"Sad fact of life"

This is an unfortunate turn of events, we can safely say without any shadow of doubt that many potential newcomers to Numismatic collecting will start their collection off only to realize later that the coins they bought in good fave were in fact fakes.

There are so many con artists today making a fast buck that the safest way to be sure of buying genuine coins is to do so via reputable vendors.

Being able to spot a fake is not the easiest task, only in educating yourself through reading material and posts will help to minimize the risks and maybe deter future counterfeiters.

Oh i forgot, gut feeling (if in doubt, dont buy) this has helped me on numerous occations.

Concerned collector.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Andrew McCabe on March 21, 2013, 06:37:22 am
"Sad fact of life"
This is an unfortunate turn of events, we can safely say without any shadow of doubt that many potential newcomers to Numismatic collecting will start their collection off only to realize later that the coins they bought in good fave were in fact fakes.
There are so many con artists today making a fast buck that the safest way to be sure of buying genuine coins is to do so via reputable vendors.
Being able to spot a fake is not the easiest task, only in educating yourself through reading material and posts will help to minimize the risks and maybe deter future counterfeiters.
Oh i forgot, gut feeling (if in doubt, dont buy) this has helped me on numerous occations.
Concerned collector.

This is probably overpessimistic, though you are right to use the "if in doubt, don't buy" control.

ALL you need to do to avoid fakes or altered coins, is to avoid eBay, and buy your coins from trusted retail sources, such as Forvm here, (or other trusted dealers whom you have bought from e.g. via sixbid or vcoins).

There is no need at all for any worries about fakes. If you buy from retail dealers who are well known and have the expertise to authenticate all the coins they sell (NB I am including here the 'ebay arm' of such retail dealers, e.g. when Forvm or HjBerk sell on eBay), then you will not buy any fakes. This is a simple solution that I've hammered away at for years, and I guarantee it works. It worked for me in my initial decade of coin collecting, and it will work for everyone here. If you follow this guidance then you will never need to worry about sellers such as numis18 or other NFSL sellers ever again.

It's in your own hands. Choose the right venue, e.g. Forvm, or another trusted retail venue, or choose the worst most unregulated market in the world.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Arados on March 21, 2013, 07:56:05 am

To be overpessimistic wasn´t my intention Andrew, it was ment has a warning for those people debating wether or not to get involved in collecting coins, your post basically mirrors my thoughts on this matter apart from your softer approach.

I feel that we both presented our concerns about counterfeiting constructively and wish all newcomers to the world of Numismatics good luck with their collections.

Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: areich on March 21, 2013, 07:58:36 am

Compare with genuine examples.
 
I've done that.

Most of them are very obviously tooled.

Not to me.

If it's not clear from looking at them, it becomes clear by comparing with genuine, untooled coins. Toolers very often get the hair and folds of garments wrong.

The hair and garments on all of these coins that I have checked are impeccable.


There are however a couple of somewhat suspect features on some these coins - can anyone spot them?

Ross G.

Then you have to compare some more. Most of these are very obviously heavily smoothed and tooled. Some of the better ones, because the pictures are small, are not as obvious but whenever you see a heavily smoothed coin, you should look for tooling as well. There is no shortcut, it takes a trained eye.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Andrew McCabe on March 21, 2013, 08:21:44 am

To be overpessimistic wasn´t my intention Andrew, it was ment has a warning for those people debating wether or not to get involved in collecting coins, your post basically mirrors my thoughts on this matter apart from your softer approach.

I feel that we both presented our concerns about counterfeiting constructively and wish all newcomers to the world of Numismatics good luck with their collections.

 +++

Just don't despair! There are many safe places to buy 100% genuine coins, including here at Forvm. Perhaps fleabay seems cheaper, but not when you account for the fakes, toolies and misleading photos.

I've worked hard on my collection to make sure it's 100% free of fakes and toolies, and I believe it is. But 90%+ of my coins are from "trusted retail dealers" and most of those that I've weeded out as fakes over the years came from ebay, which has turned out to be a poorer value venue than I imagined.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: glebe on March 21, 2013, 09:10:43 am

Compare with genuine examples.
 
I've done that.

Most of them are very obviously tooled.

Not to me.

If it's not clear from looking at them, it becomes clear by comparing with genuine, untooled coins. Toolers very often get the hair and folds of garments wrong.

The hair and garments on all of these coins that I have checked are impeccable.


There are however a couple of somewhat suspect features on some these coins - can anyone spot them?

Ross G.

Then you have to compare some more. Most of these are very obviously heavily smoothed and tooled. Some of the better ones, because the pictures are small, are not as obvious but whenever you see a heavily smoothed coin, you should look for tooling as well. There is no shortcut, it takes a trained eye.

A couple of these coins may have been smoothed but where exactly do you see tooling on them?


Ross G.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Andrew McCabe on March 21, 2013, 09:21:19 am
If it's not clear from looking at them, it becomes clear by comparing with genuine, untooled coins. Toolers very often get the hair and folds of garments wrong.

The hair and garments on all of these coins that I have checked are impeccable.


There are however a couple of somewhat suspect features on some these coins - can anyone spot them?

Ross G.

Then you have to compare some more. Most of these are very obviously heavily smoothed and tooled. Some of the better ones, because the pictures are small, are not as obvious but whenever you see a heavily smoothed coin, you should look for tooling as well. There is no shortcut, it takes a trained eye.

So where exactly do you see tooling on these coins?


Ross G.

100% agree with Andreas. The tooling and smoothing on these coins is very obvious, and just as with  questions about tourist fakes, worded "what about this coin looks fake", the answer is "everything". The fields are not struck-fields - they are not metallic at all, but rather scraped and moulded. The letters are improved throughout. The interface between devices and fields which is usually gentle, with externally directed flowlines, is abrupt and cliff-like, with no evidence of flow. The hairlines and other upper surfaces of the devices look un-natural. The patinas are wrong, relative to coins of this supposed-degree of wear, i.e. supposedly lightly worn, which should have much more delicate patinas consistent with the visible detail. There is an overall 'plastic' look that is typical of tooled coins, which I mean literally - compare the image below.

If you think I've seeing problems that don't exist, bid-away!
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: glebe on March 21, 2013, 10:32:02 am
If it's not clear from looking at them, it becomes clear by comparing with genuine, untooled coins. Toolers very often get the hair and folds of garments wrong.

The hair and garments on all of these coins that I have checked are impeccable.


There are however a couple of somewhat suspect features on some these coins - can anyone spot them?

Ross G.

Then you have to compare some more. Most of these are very obviously heavily smoothed and tooled. Some of the better ones, because the pictures are small, are not as obvious but whenever you see a heavily smoothed coin, you should look for tooling as well. There is no shortcut, it takes a trained eye.

So where exactly do you see tooling on these coins?


Ross G.

100% agree with Andreas. The tooling and smoothing on these coins is very obvious, and just as with  questions about tourist fakes, worded "what about this coin looks fake", the answer is "everything". The fields are not struck-fields - they are not metallic at all, but rather scraped and moulded. The letters are improved throughout. The interface between devices and fields which is usually gentle, with externally directed flowlines, is abrupt and cliff-like, with no evidence of flow. The hairlines and other upper surfaces of the devices look un-natural. The patinas are wrong, relative to coins of this supposed-degree of wear, i.e. supposedly lightly worn, which should have much more delicate patinas consistent with the visible detail. There is an overall 'plastic' look that is typical of tooled coins, which I mean literally - compare the image below.

If you think I've seeing problems that don't exist, bid-away!

But that's the problem with this kind of discussion - when you guys are called, we get no real specifics, just generalities such as they "look unnatural". (And why would lightly worn coins have "delicate" patinas)?
But not to worry - if you can't give me any specifics, perhaps I can supply them myself.
As I said before, on a couple of these coins there do indeed seem to be definite signs of reworking - or to be more exact, a lack of it.
On the Cap7 of Trajan for example note that on the obverse we see the border as a single line, where we might normally expect to see a row of dots.

Ross G.

(On the other hand check out the genuine Trajan sestertius below - the border dots aren't very obvious there).


Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Andrew McCabe on March 21, 2013, 10:42:25 am
100% agree with Andreas. The tooling and smoothing on these coins is very obvious, and just as with  questions about tourist fakes, worded "what about this coin looks fake", the answer is "everything". The fields are not struck-fields - they are not metallic at all, but rather scraped and moulded. The letters are improved throughout. The interface between devices and fields which is usually gentle, with externally directed flowlines, is abrupt and cliff-like, with no evidence of flow. The hairlines and other upper surfaces of the devices look un-natural. The patinas are wrong, relative to coins of this supposed-degree of wear, i.e. supposedly lightly worn, which should have much more delicate patinas consistent with the visible detail. There is an overall 'plastic' look that is typical of tooled coins, which I mean literally - compare the image below.

If you think I've seeing problems that don't exist, bid-away!

But that's the problem with this kind of discussion - when you guys are called, we get no real specifics, just generalities such as they "look unnatural".

I gave a list of specifics. The scraped and moulded-look field is one key. And regarding lightly worn / delicate patinas, the point is that with heavy patinas you should not see these details; the details on lightly worn coins is typically only properly visible when the patina is light. With heavy patinas, you would expect a lot of randomly obscured details around hair and lettering; not seen on these coins, because these coins have been tooled in the bare metal and then repatinated in an even but thick manner, and care has been taken to make sure the repatination doesn't obscure anything. It's all artificial.

You might also consider relying somewhat on the known expertise of those ("you guys" as you nicely refer to us) whose focus is on bronze coins. In the last two weeks I personally examined 4,000 bronze coins, one by one, that I had not previously handled, and almost all of which have never been individually sold at market and certainly not photographed. All were old-collection pieces, mostly in reasonably decent condition, and most came from very old group lots that had hardly ever been examined, let alone tooled. Among the 4,000 coins, I pulled out and marked less than 10 that I consider over-cleaned or tooled, along with 2 or 3 fakes. So I don't jump the gun. I consider each coin on its merits. I'm cautious about condemning coins. Yet had the numis18 coins passed through my hands I'd have pulled out all of them.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: SRukke on March 21, 2013, 07:36:50 pm
His negative feedback says - numis18 = johan2850 = ardenias21 so maybe he has other accounts.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: glebe on March 21, 2013, 08:45:52 pm
Here's one that actually is obvious (from numis18's recent Ebay sales).  The hair and beard are inconsistent with the rest of the coin.

Ross G.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on March 27, 2013, 02:26:24 pm
Here's yet another current listing on fleabay from "numis18."

Trajan Sestertius.

Fake Report added.

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Caesarincarnate on March 31, 2013, 10:01:07 pm
Thank god for this site. I am very new to numismatics and as such I do not have the trained eye required to spot the numerous fakes out there. But something just seemed wrong about this guy. Initially I was bidding on a current listing of his which would have run upwards of $400-500. But then I got suspicious and decided to do some research. On the net are numerous examples of very similar sestertii in fantastic condition that he has been selling to unsuspecting collectors and made thousands at it. The smoking gun was when I typed in numis18 fake coin. That's when I found this page. Thank you all for the work and research you put in to provide this valuable service to us amateurs.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: HELEN S on April 01, 2013, 03:30:40 am
Thank god for this site. I am very new to numismatics and as such I do not have the trained eye required to spot the numerous fakes out there. But something just seemed wrong about this guy. Initially I was bidding on a current listing of his which would have run upwards of $400-500. But then I got suspicious and decided to do some research. On the net are numerous examples of very similar sestertii in fantastic condition that he has been selling to unsuspecting collectors and made thousands at it. The smoking gun was when I typed in numis18 fake coin. That's when I found this page. Thank you all for the work and research you put in to provide this valuable service to us amateurs.

 welcome to the forum you have learnt a valuable lesson research not only the coin but the seller looking forward to seeing your coins  +++ +++
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Caesarincarnate on April 01, 2013, 04:55:56 pm
I called eBay and reported this jerk. It seems as though they are putting a restriction on his account so maybe they will finally do something about him. Oh and yes I do have some really beautiful coins I will be posting soon. So nice to have a forum to share my interests with like-minded people. ;D
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Mark Z on April 01, 2013, 06:20:02 pm
Caesar,

This one was posted on fleabay about one hour ago.

I originally caught it back in very early February 2013. Scroll back up to the top of this thread to the post dated 02/03/13.

It is either the exact same coin with different lighting or ANOTHER coin from the same mold. Either way, it is the same fake.

As for fleabay restricting his account, they are pretty liberal when it comes to complaints against sellers, requiring indisputable evidence before they ban a cash cow like this guy.

Regards,
mz
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: crawforde on April 01, 2013, 07:05:37 pm
Here's yet another current listing on fleabay from "numis18."

Trajan Sestertius.

Fake Report added.

Regards,
mz
I'm not sure what is going on, but I see a picture of Andrew's avatar instead of the fake Trajan mentioned in the post.  Is it just me?
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Molinari on April 01, 2013, 07:15:34 pm
Here's yet another current listing on fleabay from "numis18."

Trajan Sestertius.

Fake Report added.

Regards,T
mz
I'm not sure what is going on, but I see a picture of Andrew's avatar instead of the fake Trajan mentioned in the post.  Is it just me?


Are you viewing from a smartphone?  It has happened to me before but only when viewing from my iPhone.

Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: Caesarincarnate on April 01, 2013, 07:22:43 pm
Caesar,

This one was posted on fleabay about one hour ago.

I originally caught it back in very early February 2013. Scroll back up to the top of this thread to the post dated 02/03/13.

It is either the exact same coin with different lighting or ANOTHER coin from the same mold. Either way, it is the same fake.

As for fleabay restricting his account, they are pretty liberal when it comes to complaints against sellers, requiring indisputable evidence before they ban a cash cow like this guy.

Regards,
mz
Yeah that figures. Maybe if enough people call them and report him they will finally do something. Or if the people that bought the fake coins submitted proof to eBay then perhaps they would do something also. I am in the process of getting a $650 refund for a fake Lysimachus tetradrachm that I bought. They said as soon as I send the fax showing that the coin has been deemed a counterfeit by NGC they will refund my money.
Title: Re: "numis18" has been busy...
Post by: crawforde on April 01, 2013, 07:35:29 pm
I am on an iPad, maybe that is causing it.

Was causing it I mean.  All is normal now.