Classical Numismatics Discussion
  Welcome Guest. Please login or register. All Items Purchased From Forum Ancient Coins Are Guaranteed Authentic For Eternity!!! Explore Our Website And Find Joy In The History, Numismatics, Art, Mythology, And Geography Of Coins!!! Expert Authentication - Accurate Descriptions - Reasonable Prices - Coins From Under $10 To Museum Quality Rarities Welcome Guest. Please login or register. Internet challenged? We Are Happy To Take Your Order Over The Phone 252-646-1958 Explore Our Website And Find Joy In The History, Numismatics, Art, Mythology, And Geography Of Coins!!! Support Our Efforts To Serve The Classical Numismatics Community - Shop At Forum Ancient Coins

New & Reduced


Author Topic: VOT V mintmark issue  (Read 662 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Csaba K

  • Consul
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
VOT V mintmark issue
« on: January 12, 2022, 06:41:05 am »
Hello All,

i am trying to ID this coin by using the excel files from http://www.catbikes.ch/
so when i filter for 'delta' in mintmark the only results containing CAESS are all with a left facing bust types
what am i doing wrong here?
thanks in advance
Csaba

Offline Lech Stępniewski

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 2923
    • NOT IN RIC
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2022, 06:59:25 am »
Your coin is RIC VII THESSALONICA 38, unlisted officina.

CRISPVS NOBILISS CAES, bust B4
VOT V / MVLY X / CAESS TS :Greek_Delta: (RIC lists only officina epsilon).

Could you give weight and diameter? Better picture is also welcome.
Lech Stępniewski
NOT IN RIC
Poland

Offline Csaba K

  • Consul
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2022, 07:19:52 am »
diameter is around 18-19 mm
weight is 3g (not super exact,as i used only a kitchen scale)
more photos to follow in a few hrs
Can this coin be added to RIC?

Offline Csaba K

  • Consul
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2022, 07:33:04 am »
here are some (hopefully) better pictures

Offline Lech Stępniewski

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 2923
    • NOT IN RIC
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2022, 11:04:35 am »
more photos to follow in a few hrs

Please, take a picture of the obverse focusing on sharpness of legend. I am pretty sure that legend is CRISPVS NOBILISS CAES but it should be also visible on picture.

Can this coin be added to RIC?

Yes, i.e. should be added note to THESSALONICA 38 that also officina delta is now attested.
Lech Stępniewski
NOT IN RIC
Poland

Offline Csaba K

  • Consul
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2022, 11:18:16 am »
here are some more photos
what is the process to add some new coins to RIC?
what do i have to do?
thanks again

Offline Lech Stępniewski

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 2923
    • NOT IN RIC
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2022, 11:30:21 am »
here are some more photos

The first picture is sharp but I need WHOLE obverse (and reverse too) on one picture

what do i have to do?

Nothing. I am going to add your coin on my "Not in RIC" website so the info of the new officina will be available for the whole numismatic community.
Lech Stępniewski
NOT IN RIC
Poland

Offline quadrans

  • Tribunus Plebis 2019
  • Procurator Monetae
  • Caesar
  • *****
  • Posts: 10703
  • Ad perpetuam rei memoriam. Ars longa, vita brevis.
    • My Gallery Albums
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2022, 01:37:36 pm »
I try to help...  :) ;) +++

but the resolution and the sharpness are not too good...


Joe
All the Best :), Joe
My Gallery

Offline Csaba K

  • Consul
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2022, 01:38:26 pm »
not sure if these are better

Offline Lech Stępniewski

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 2923
    • NOT IN RIC
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #9 on: January 12, 2022, 03:35:49 pm »
Quote from: quadrans on January 12, 2022, 01:37:36 pm
but the resolution and the sharpness are not too good...

And also the coin itself is worn. Thanks, Joe.
Lech Stępniewski
NOT IN RIC
Poland

Offline quadrans

  • Tribunus Plebis 2019
  • Procurator Monetae
  • Caesar
  • *****
  • Posts: 10703
  • Ad perpetuam rei memoriam. Ars longa, vita brevis.
    • My Gallery Albums
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #10 on: January 12, 2022, 03:37:40 pm »
Quote from: quadrans on January 12, 2022, 01:37:36 pm
but the resolution and the sharpness are not too good...

And also the coin itself is worn. Thanks, Joe.

It's OK,  +++

Joe
All the Best :), Joe
My Gallery

Offline Lech Stępniewski

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 2923
    • NOT IN RIC
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2022, 03:39:23 pm »
not sure if these are better

No bad but very small. If your bigger pictures (kike this one with only 1/4 of the coin) are too big for attachment, you can send them on my email: notinric@lechstepniewski.info
Lech Stępniewski
NOT IN RIC
Poland

Offline Csaba K

  • Consul
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #12 on: January 12, 2022, 04:07:53 pm »
thanks all for your help!
this is really exciting to find a new coin variant not yet in RIC
i just started to collect coins a few months ago.I am not sure how often you encounter a new type?
i will try to do some bigger photos tomorrow

Offline Csaba K

  • Consul
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #13 on: January 13, 2022, 06:22:44 am »
i was not able to make any better photos,sorry
please use these ones

Offline Lech Stępniewski

  • Procurator Caesaris
  • Caesar
  • ****
  • Posts: 2923
    • NOT IN RIC
Re: VOT V mintmark issue
« Reply #14 on: January 13, 2022, 09:52:22 am »
i was not able to make any better photos,sorry
please use these ones

That's OK. Thank you for all you have done.
Lech Stępniewski
NOT IN RIC
Poland

 

All coins are guaranteed for eternity