Practice makes perfect! I find that viewing a *LOT* of coins assists with familiarity.
Most
portraits of rulers from, say,
Julius Caesar until around the time of
Carus are
generally readily recognisable without assistance of the legends. There are a few
exceptions, of course, but that is my own humble experience (plus it probably took
several years to get to that point).
From the later 3rd century onward there are a series of fairly generic or
standard portraits that, again with some exceptions, were fairly similar to each of the other
portraits from the same times. The Tetrarchs, Constantinian, and so on.
The
portrait seemed to matter less than the representation and what it stood for.
As far as those with the greatest variety - I'd go for one of the rulers who began
as a
youth, and lived for a sufficiently long time for these changes to be recorded
and then depicted: eg.
Nero,
Marcus Aurelius,
Caracalla; others?
Good question. Food for thought.
Walter
Holt