Yes, there are a lot of reconstructions in Packer's book.
I want to point out though that according to newer research, earlier archeologists and Packer got the location of the Temple of
Trajan wrong.
Ahave understood it the location of the temple is not really certain, but it would seem that we previously
had the
forum backwards. The entrance according to this newer research is located in the northwest of the
forum, on the same
side as the
column. This would pretty much give
Forum of
Trajan the same layout as the other fora.
(Source: TTC
Experiencing Rome: A Visual Exploration of Antiquity's Greatest Empire)
I also read that there has been traces of Insulae not consistent with a Temple found northwest of the
forum.
"Though research has
still not precisely determined its site with precision. It
had been assumed it was on the site of Palazzo Valentini and that this palazzo
had reused
stone from the temple in its construction but archaeological excavations there have found no trace of a temple, only remains of insulae with shallower foundations than those needed for a temple. This possibly puts the temple at the centre of the
forum courtyard, looking towards the
forum of
Augustus or elsewhere (some have suggested the two rooms in the
Library, though there is evidence against this) and not in a northern position as has previously been commonly accepted by archaeologists for more than a century."
(Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_of_TrajanEdit: I
still value the book highly for the reasons mentioned in the previuos post. The location of the
Basilica Ulpia, Trajan's
column and the libraries are not in question.