Happy C. Gothicvs

[Raymond]

Other than a poorer obverse, a shovel slash (and an even poorer pic) might this be the same coin as [DEAD LINK REMOVED BY ADMIN]
IMP CLAVDIVS (PF AVG) radiate bust right, FELIC TE(MPO) Felicity left holding caduceus and long scepter, T (Ticinum) in ex. RIC 146
Raymond

[Pscipio]

With P F in the obverse legend, it is RIC 145. The T is an officina mark, not a mintmark, the mint is Mediolanum (Mailand is German for Milano, the modern name of Mediolanum).

I had already wondered in March why Gorny rates that coin Rare, and the estimate of 500 EUR is nonsense. Of course nobody bought it; an estimate of 25 EUR would have been more realistic. I hope the CA-listing didn't lead you to expect a rarity.

Lars

[Raymond]

is the mint indicated anywhere?
Wildwinds showed a similar specimen sold for $9, a far cry from the C.A. price and Van Meter rates it as VB1, common!
Raymond

[Pscipio]

No, this is a time where the coins do not yet have clear mintmarks. They can be differentiated by style; the CA-coin, for example, has a typical Mediolanum Claudius II. portrait: a large blown up back of the head with a rather small face.

Lars

[Raymond]

typical Mediolanum Claudius II. portrait: a large blown up back of the head with a rather small face.

Right! Most C.G's picture him with a weasel-like pointy nose.   Thanks so much Lars.
Raymond