Supposed that the
Roman spear, is much more damaged, because it is found in the river.
Made of iron, but it is much more corrosion destroyed.
I purchased it as soon as he found in river.
I have personally removed corrosion with the
help of acids and wire brush.
Unfortunately, many of the damaged parts of the fallen (was found completely).
I
had to, because it was the only way to permanently save left of the spear of destruction.
Shine on photography because I keep it in the oil.
What is your opinion, is really
Roman or older or younger?
Please note that the
area where he found people living over 10000 years,
from
Stone Age to the present day in continuity.
Unfortunately, because the state is
poor, usually are not performed more archaeological excavations,
most often built new buildings over archaeological locality.
Sorry for
poor knowledge English language, I
hope that you understand the text
