I have
his two-volume
work on
Trajan (
Bernhard Woytek, Die Reichsprägung
des Kaisers Traianus (98-117),
Moneta Imperii Romani/MIB 14)
Sestertius with SC in fields is 243 whereas those with SC in the
exergue are 326. He dates the first (243) to Group 9, Cluster 3-4, AD 106-107 and the second (326) to group 10, Cluster 3-4, AD 109/110. The
obverse legends are the same.
It is true that
Woytek is working on RICII.2 covering
Trajan. From what I understand the approach will be similar to that taken in Richard
Abdy's RICII.3 covering Hardian. Differences such as SC in
field vs SC in
exergue, and
legend breaks, will all be treated under the same
RIC number unless there is a specific reason to divide them - for example a
fair certainty that the variation represents one that was important chronologically, e.g. the SC
field came before the SC
exergue like this one.
SC