One reason we all should study Latin is to understand what derivative words like 'expert' actually mean when used otherwise than with awe or a sneer (which are two sides of the same coin, so to speak). There are, of course, such persons as self-proclaimed experts (often more to be pitied than censured, they have such severe and painful "issues"), but intelligent persons who devote themselves day in and day out to studying coins and their metals and techniques acquire the experience (just counting
money won't give it to you) that makes them experts, provided only that they have self-knowledge enough to retire if, say, they are 90 and have cataracts or glaucoma. These experts aren't 'proving themselves' at the expense of
numismatics; they only know a great deal by experience and are willing to share their experience for the sake of the discipline,
numismatics.
I myself do not have experience in those
Apollonia Pontica gorgoneia, and I have never
had Marsha's coin in hand. I admit that I see nothing wrong with it (it certainly looks like
good silver, but...).
But Marsha, if you like it and it's not expensive, get it. That's what I did, and just to show that a
Procurator Monetae can be uncerrtain, too, here is the one I got. Years ago. I'd need to study a lot of them to be an expert on these, and not study them with any
axe to grind.
Pat L.
• 10 III 00 AR
drachm.
Apollonia Pontika, colony of
Miletos.
Obv. Gorgoneion.
Rev. Anchor, crayfish, and A.
NOTA BENE: Considering when and where this coin was purchased, it has at best a 50:50 chance of being genuine, even though it does not positively match one of the dies (not all of them are there) at:
http://rg.cointalk.org/bulgarian_school/forgeries.htmlMy 7-year-old link no longer works, and I now see that the
anchor is the
obverse!