The Age of Gallienus
Ancient Coin Collecting 101
Ancient Coin Dates
Ancient Coins & Modern Fakes
Ancient Oil Lamps
Ancient Wages and Prices
Ancient Weights and Scales
Anonymous Class A Folles
Armenian Numismatics Page
A Cabinet of Greek Coins
Caesarean and Actian Eras
Campgates of Constantine
A Case of Counterfeits
Coins of Pontius Pilate
Conditions of Manufacture
Corinth Coins and Cults
Countermarked in Late Antiquity
Denarii of Otho
Dictionary of Roman Coins
Doug Smith's Ancient Coins
Edict on Prices
ERIC - Rarity Tables
The Evolving Ancient Coin Market
Facing Portrait of Augustus
Fel Temp Reparatio
Fertility Pregnancy and Childbirth
Friend or Foe
The Gallic Empire
Greek Coin Denominations
Greek Mythology Link
Greek Numismatic Dictionary
Hellenistic Names & their Meanings
Helvetica's ID Help Page
Identifying Ancient Metal Arrowheads
Illustrated Ancient Coin Glossary
Islamic Rulers and Dynasties
Imperial Mints of Philip the Arab
Later Roman Coinage
Library of Ancient Coinage
Life in Ancient Rome
Maps of the Ancient World
Not in RIC
Numismatic Excellence Award
Pi-Style Athens Tetradrachms
Pricing and Grading Roman Coins
Representations of Alexander the Great
Roman Coin Attribution 101
Rome and China
The Sign that Changed the World
Silver Content of Parthian Drachms
Sylloge Nummorum Graecorum
Taras Drachms with Owl Left
The Temple Tax Hoard
Travels of Paul
Tribute Penny Debate Continued (2015)
Tribute Penny Debate Revisited (2006)
What Did The Julio Claudians Really Look Like?
What I Like About Ancient Coins
by Alberto Trivero
This Guide is an annex of the Catalogue of Sicilian Folles written by the author. It provides a simple scheme to recognize quickly and with reasonable certainty a coinage which is not free of difficulty. Note: This text is in Italian, translated to English using google translator. Excuse me for mistakes!
Trivero, Alberto. La monetazione di rame della Sicilia bizantina (testo e archivio fotografico allegato). (Achao, 2006).
The key to distinguishing the follis of type 1 is the monogram, always present in the types of the 7th and 8th century, and from the legend at the obverse for two follis of 9th century. The bust of Constant II usually (but not always) has a very impressive long beard and mustache. Another element of difference is dress.
The recognition is immediate, since there is only one follis Syracuse of this kind, issued by Constantine IV.
Again, the recognition is immediate, since there is only follis of Justinian II. The most similar type, struck by Leontius, can most easily be distinguished by a full-length figure of the emperor standing facing with a globus cruciger in his left hand.
Follis Syracuse of the 4th kind, one of the most frequent, often can only be identified with certainty when the obverse or the reverse the legend is legible. Unfortunately, in most cases the legend is present only in small part, as the coins were often smaller than the dies (and thus often much of the legend was outside the perimeter of flan, and was unstruck). Dress, which may be the loros or chlamys, is important for identification. Generally, the portrait with a loros is designated the obverse, but for the types, designation of the obverse and reverse often seems to be arbitrary. When the portraits on the both the obverse and reverse wear a chlamys, the coin may be attributed to Nichephorus (however, this attribution is controversial). The appearance of the obverse portrait is also useful. Nicephorus became emperor when he was over fifty, his portrait is bearded and mature, with a squared face. Michael and Leo are younger with thinner faces.
This type with an "M" in the exergue under the reverse bust is easily recognizable and attributed only to Leo III.
Type 6 is distinguished by the full-length figure of the emperor standing facing, instead of only the bust. Attribution of type 6 focuses on reading the monogram above the M on the reverse.
This follis type can immediate recognized, as the full-length figure of the emperor standing facing on the obverse with a lower case "m on the reverse, was struck only by Leontius. The most similar coin, struck by Justinian II, has only the bust on the obverse, and the emperor holds the globus cruciger in his right hand. Auctions sometimes mistakenly attribute the much more common coins of Leo III to Leontius, whose emissions are relatively rare.
Again, the recognition is easy, and the type unique, coined only by Constantine IV.
Although there are only two emperors who coined such follis - Leo III and his son, Constantine V - identification is often difficult and uncertain. The identification is most easily made by observing the face accompanied by the legend KWNS: if the figure is without beard, the follis was struck by Leo III, if bearded it was struck by Constantine V. In addition to confusing the attribution of types between Leo III and Constantine V, catalogues and auction listings sometimes erroneously attribute coins of Leo III to Leontius, and vice versa.
Three emperors struck this type. The difference between them ensure recognition is usually not difficult, even when the legend is hardly legible.
This type of follis is represented only by one issue struck by Leo V and Constantine as co-emperors.
There are two issues of this type, usually easily distinguishable by the legends, but also by different dress and the different styles.
The two folles of this type are easily distinguishable by the portraits and monograms, but poorly struck or preserved examples can easily be confused.
A unique type, struck only by Constantine II.
A unique type, struck only by Constantine IV.