Classical Numismatics Discussion Members' Gallery
  Welcome Guest. Please login or register.

Members' Gallery Home | Member Collections | Last Added | Last Comments | Most Viewed | Top Rated | My Favorities | Search Galleries
Home > Members' Coin Collection Galleries > Stkp > ELYMAIS
Click to view full size image
Elymais. Arsacid dynasty. Probably a contemporary regional counterfeit struck during the reign of Prince A (late 2nd to early 3rd centuries A.D.), or later.
van't Haaff --; De Morgan --; BMC --; Sear GICV --; Alram --

AE unit (denomination undetermined), 2.51 g., 12.59 mm. max., 0į

Obv.: Bust facing left, side whiskers as double row of dots.

Rev.: Plain diadem of two bands with fine lines, pellet border.

The obverse bust most closely resembles Prince A (late 2nd to early 3rd centuries A.D.), van't Haaff 19.1.1-1A, whereas the reverse mirrors Phraates (early-mid 2nd century A.D.), van't Haaff 14.4.1-2). Due to the decades between these rulers, the coin is probably not a mule. The coins of Phraates may have remained in circulation during the reign of Prince A, and beyond. The coin is probably a contemporary regional counterfeit inspired by the Phraates reverse. However, the diadem on the reverse is a reference to sky god Bel, and the possibility that the coin is an unrecorded official coin, issued by Prince A with the revived iconography of Phraates, cannot be excluded.

Attribution assistance courtesy of Pieter Anne van't Haaff (thanks to Robert L3), and Robert L3.
File information
Filename:ELYMAIS_Unidentified_King.jpg
Album name:Stkp / ELYMAIS
File Size:158 KB
Date added:Jan 25, 2018
Dimensions:1036 x 524 pixels
Displayed:48 times
URL:http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pos=-143343
Favorites:Add to Favorites
Robert L3  [Jan 25, 2018 at 09:42 AM]
A wonderful find, unpublished and perhaps unique. Congrats.
Michael C8  [Oct 09, 2018 at 09:08 PM]
The reverse is a match for BMC Arabia pl XLII coins 24 and 25 which are issues of the same unknown King (22 and 23 are van't Haaff type 21). I have a similar coin with a left facing portrait (bought in August 2017) so I think these are likely an official issue.