Hi all, this was to go in the authentication
thread but I
had a few other questions besides that so I figured I'd post it here for a
bit wider discussion. I
hope that's ok.
So first, maybe unlikely that someone would
fake something beat up like this but... A few things made me wonder. 1.) although theres
still some detail on the
reverse, the relief is oddly low. 2.) the bare metal on the scratched up
part is much more "yellow" than most of the bronze coins I have. However, the edges look
good under magnification, the coin looks struck and it "feels" right... whatever that means. Authentic?
Second question: Around the beginning and end of the
reverse legend, there are slight depressions around some of the letters. Is this always a sign of tooling or does this effect occur naturally in some cases?
Third question: As you can see this one has some major scratches with bare metal showing through. The coin would be a lot more attractive if some of that metal was closer to the tone of the remaining
patina. I've never "
toned" anything. Do you recommend it or just leave it alone? If so is there a household way of doing this?
Thanks, I
hope I didn't over do it with the questions.
Josh
IMP CAESAR TRAIANVS HADRIANVS
AVG, laureate
bust right /
PONT MAX TR POT COS DES III S-C,
ANNONA AVG in ex,
Annona standing left with grain ears &
cornucopiae;
modius left, prow right.
Cohen 180
RIC II 560b
25-27mm,
axis: 6, no
weight available