It is also a nice way to make genuine coins look better.
There are some dealers who are very expert and honest and yet who have almost an entire inventory of coins that look like that. And that is because some/many of them have
had the "treatment".
Like many things involving
ancient coins there are many shades of grey.
To me the key questions are:
- Is it reversible? (To me, mud slip = ok, adding glue = not ok)
- Is it done to hide anything? (
Fake, signs of tooling, etc. Here the only real
hope seems to be "know your seller".)
- Is there full disclosure? (yes = ok, no not = ok; then you can decide for yourself)
To me, if done properly (with respect to the above questions) then it is even less harmless than re-patination as it is less "invasive" and more easily reversible (don't like it, then wash it off).
Frankly there are many of my coins that would look better with it. If I knew how I might do it to some. I am not a dealer but I would
still note which ones I did it to anyway for future sales or disbursement of the
collection. But I don't know how and so haven't.
Shawn