LICINIUS I, 308-324./ Emperor, wearing military attire and chlamys, on horse!!!

[Salem Alshdaifat]

Hi folks.
I dont know what am I missing here, I cant find this in Ric under Rome ???LICINIUS I, 308-324. (, 2.67 gm) IMP LICIN-IVS P F AVG Laureate head r. Rev. Emperor, wearing military attire and chlamys, on horse galloping r., spearing with his r. hand prostrate foeman, head turning, lion below.
best.
Salem Alshdifat

[HELEN S]

  OBVERSE
 IMPLICINIVSPFAVG [IMP LICINIVS P F AVG]; bust r., laur., cuir.
 
REVERSE
 LIBERA-T-ORORBIS [LIBERATOR ORBIS]; Emperor galloping r. over lion, r. raised, shield on l. arm. R*P in exergue.
 
NOT IN RIC
 UNLISTED ISSUE. DRC apparently mentions this issue in the article "LIBERATOR ORBIS": "-The Liberator of the World
 
  ok the difference i can see is the reverse legend from your example  is split differently
  LIBER  A  TORORBIS

[HELEN S]

OBVERSE
 IMPLICINIVSPFAVG [IMP LICINIVS P F AVG]; bust r., laur., cuir.
 
REVERSE
 LIBERA-TORORBIS [LIBERATOR ORBIS]; Emperor galloping r. over lion, r. raised, shield on l. arm. R*[officina illegible] in exergue.
 
NOT IN RIC
 UNLISTED ISSUE. DRC apparently mentions this issue in the article "LIBERATOR ORBIS": "-The Liberator of the World

 and this one has the T in the correct place but the LIBERA is together whereas your A is split away VERY INTERESTING
 i am off out hope to see an answer when i come back GOOD LUCK

 your coin is a beautiful example with lovely detail set off by the sand patina WOW
 

[HELEN S]

 ok i am back third time lucky EUREKA

RIC VII, ROME [after 17], LICINIUS I, UNLISTED ISSUE [LIBERATOR ORBIS], BUST TYPE B4, OFFICINA T

  

OBVERSE
 IMPLICINIVSPFAVG [IMP LICINIVS P F AVG]; bust r., laur., dr., cuir.
 
REVERSE
 L-IBER-A-TORORBIS [LIBERATOR ORBIS]; Emperor galloping r. over lion, r. raised, shield on l. arm. R*T in exergue.
 
NOT IN RIC
 UNLISTED ISSUE. DRC apparently mentions this issue in the article "LIBERATOR ORBIS": "-The Liberator of the World


  i am not sure if this third example is a die match to yours?  
 

 

[Heliodromus]

The type's listed in Cohen (Constantine I = Cohen 317, Licinius I = Cohen 132), but somehow RIC missed it.

Ben

[Salem Alshdaifat]

Thanks Helena
I see why I couldn't find it now .
Thanks Ben as well.
warm regards.
Salem Alshdaifat

[Salem Alshdaifat]

Helena
the third coin you listed seems to be a die match for both Obv and Rev.
very interesting !!!
Salem Alshdaifat

[HELEN S]

Helena
the third coin you listed seems to be a die match for both Obv and Rev.
very interesting !!!
Salem Alshdaifat

 i found it in NOT IN RIC  hopefully i will put up a link for you

 https://www.forumancientcoins.com/notinric/7rom-17_2_t.html


 you can click on the main page and put in the search LICINIUS EMPEROR GALLOPING and all the variations will come up

 your coin is the first example 

[Lech Stępniewski]

Hi Salem,

it is the best example I have seen. Could you give me the weight and the diameter of your coin, please