Comparing
Van Meter to Failmezger's "
Roman Bronze Coins" is an apples vs oranges comparison, and which one(s) someone might find useful depends on what they are looking for.
Both books target beginners, but
Van Meter covers the entire
Roman Imperial period while
Failmezger covers only the time of
Constantine or thereabouts. Both books are of similar size, giving you an idea of the degree of depth vs breadth in what they cover. Failmezger's book is much more attractive being a hardback printed on high
quality paper and with a mass of full-color photos (also available on CD for a nominal cost).
As a beginner I bought
Van Meter and having skimmed it left it on the shelf unread. I just don't get why people rave over it. It seems primarily (at least in terms of
bulk) to be an
attribution book, whereas as a beginner I wanted to learn about the coins, not just look them up. I found
Failmezger to be instantly useful in *understanding* the coins and must have consulted it many times a day for at least the first year. I
still occasionally go back to the CD to find images of coins I can't find elsewhere.
It should be noted that Failmezger's "
Roman Bronze Coins" is NOT an
attribution book - you wont find obverse-reverse pairings in this book, or really any mention of obverses at all (a minor weakness, but not one that really detracts from the books purpose), although it does assign it's own reference numbers to
reverse types which tie the
history, coin listings, photos and
index together. OTOH I'm not sure that
Van Meter numbers are any more useful than
Failmezger ones for anything other than your own private purposes.
Ben