Wish List Suggestions

[SRukke]

This may sound petty but is there any chance a couple enhancements can be made to the wish list format? Maybe it isn't designed to have a lot of coins on it but I do this and then buy one as soon as one is paid off. But when searching my wish list there is no next page icon on the bottom of the page which requires you to then go back to the top to switch pages. And when I remove a coin for whatever reason, sold, lack of interest etc., it takes you back to page #1. It is really labor intensive to search through my wish list and buy a coin. At least as labor intensive as a recliner and keyboard can be.  But then again the faster your cash register goes the more money that flows.

[Joe Sermarini]

That is on our to-do list.  It will probably take about a month for us to get it done.  Here are the planned enhancements:

- The member can set the priority for each item as high, medium or low (simple drop down selection).
- A small comment field for each wish list item.
- Ability to change the number of wish list items per wish list page.
- Ability to switch directly to a specific wish list page (rather than lots of hitting NEXT) on top and bottom of page.
- When an item is removed from the wish list the browser should return to the wish list page from which the item was removed, rather than first page of the wish list.
- When an item is removed from the wish list, the number of items shown on header notification should immediately update.
- Display coins in priority order.

[lordmarcovan]

I realize I just replied to a three-year-old thread but I did experience some quirkiness with the Wish List feature.

I noticed some of the issues mentioned, too, as I had like sixty-some coins in my wish list and was trying to trim it down a bit. (I could never afford ALL of them unless I hit the lottery, haha.)

But I got around OK.  I'm just happy that the feature is there at all.  

[Sam]

I suggest a reasonable membership fee.This site costs .

[Sam]

Calling the Roman emperor Philip I , Philip I , the Arab is not correct and is a historical mistake.

The correct is Philip I , the Syrian.