Classical Numismatics Discussion
  Welcome Guest. Please login or register. STORE WIDE SALE!!! 10% OFF EVERYTHING UNTIL 2 JUNE Layaway and reserve are not available during the sale. Shop now and save! Welcome Guest. Please login or register. STORE WIDE SALE!!! 10% OFF EVERYTHING UNTIL 2 JUNE Shop now and save! Please support Forum with your PURCHASES!


FORVM`s Classical Numismatics Discussion Board  |  Resources  |  Fake Coin Reports, Notorious Fake Sellers, and Discussions (Moderators: maridvnvm, Ilya Prokopov)  |  Topic: Badly Tooled Coins Here 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 25 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Badly Tooled Coins Here  (Read 111558 times)
Lloyd Taylor
Guest
« Reply #225 on: August 01, 2011, 06:29:06 pm »

Two heads are better than one when it comes to tooling... at least this seems to be the conclusion from the popularity of this type with the toolers.
Logged
Steve E
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


My favorite Forvm purchase, so far!


« Reply #226 on: August 01, 2011, 07:17:54 pm »

Mr Hyde and Dr. Jekyll  Grin

~Steve
Logged

Ghengis Jon
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 663



« Reply #227 on: August 08, 2011, 06:07:52 am »

The hammer price for the Janusform Sextus Pompey was €222 ($315 US).   Here's the reverse:


Logged

Don't buy uncleaneds from ebay's ancientcoinman - 70% slugs and NO returns!
Lloyd Taylor
Guest
« Reply #228 on: August 08, 2011, 06:33:27 am »

The hammer price for the Janusform Sextus Pompey was €222 ($315 US).   Here's the reverse:

The buyer would have been better served spending the money on new spectacles!
Logged
Andrew McCabe
Tribunus Plebis Perpetuus
Procurator Monetae
Caesar
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4771



WWW
« Reply #229 on: August 11, 2011, 12:11:01 pm »

A well tended coif...

A friend brightly pointed out that this is in fact a Pompey/Agrippa As (Agrippa facing right with his characteristic battered features and broken nose). Yes of course it is!

The seller did plainly say that the coin is tooled.
Logged

areich
Tribunus Plebis Perpetuus
Procurator Monetae
Caesar
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8810



WWW
« Reply #230 on: August 15, 2011, 01:53:00 pm »

Here's a tooled Cleopatra VII and an unaltered one to compare.

Logged

Frans Diederik
Procurator Caesaris
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2739


carpe diem, vita brevis est!


« Reply #231 on: August 16, 2011, 01:44:30 pm »

Here's an Antoninus as which ought to have Jupiter seated.......nude to the waist!


Frans
Logged
Ghengis Jon
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 663



« Reply #232 on: August 19, 2011, 08:52:47 am »

Gasp!!  Poor Hadrian...
Logged

Don't buy uncleaneds from ebay's ancientcoinman - 70% slugs and NO returns!
rover1.3
Tribunus Plebis 2012 / Procurator Monetae
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1585



« Reply #233 on: August 23, 2011, 01:11:14 pm »

No comment.
Logged
Enodia
Procurator Caesaris
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2288


~ For My Star ~


« Reply #234 on: August 23, 2011, 01:20:21 pm »

wow.
that should qualify as animal abuse. 
Logged

Frans Diederik
Procurator Caesaris
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2739


carpe diem, vita brevis est!


« Reply #235 on: August 23, 2011, 03:08:00 pm »

Probably belonged to a dentist who couldn't stand the gasping cavities... Grin


Frans

PS the fillings could be ancient, though.
Logged
Lloyd Taylor
Guest
« Reply #236 on: August 23, 2011, 03:23:45 pm »

A very interesting example of attempted ancient repair, rather than tooling. The infill of the test cuts looks ancient, rather than modern, with no attempt to deceive by matching the metal, bronze (or is it iron?) infill in a silver coin! The effort involved in the repairs would have been appreciable to achieve a tight match to the varying shape of each cut. The repairs appears to be an effort to improve the cosmetics of the coin (in ancient times?).  The fact that one cut remains incompletely filled, or more likely has lost its part of its filling, suggests an ancient origin, rather than a modern attempt to deceive.

However, the question remains... why?  

I vaguely recall some numismatic research, which suggested that defaced coins were less acceptable in some regions and this may explain why, although I am not certain on this point.

Certainly the coin has a story to tell and that makes it all the more interesting. It'd be nice to examine it more closely and see what can be gleaned by way of form and process applied to make the repairs.
Logged
Enodia
Procurator Caesaris
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2288


~ For My Star ~


« Reply #237 on: August 24, 2011, 01:34:26 am »

i'm always curious as to why these coins were so butchered.   Huh
i mean, what did the fifth test cut reveal that the other four hadn't already?
Logged

Lloyd Taylor
Guest
« Reply #238 on: August 24, 2011, 01:48:24 am »

i'm always curious as to why these coins were so butchered.   Huh
i mean, what did the fifth test cut reveal that the other four hadn't already?

One theory is that these were not tests cuts at all, but rather administrative marks/controls made by different authorities in the Persian administration in the east, where many of the Athenian tets ended up circulating. The placement of each cut is specific to the administrative body concerned according to this theory.  Thus this coin circulated through several administrative controls in the East, if this theory is correct.  This theory makes sense to me, but is rejected by many others.
Logged
Steve E
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


My favorite Forvm purchase, so far!


« Reply #239 on: August 24, 2011, 02:05:36 am »

The placement of each cut is specific to the administrative body concerned according to this theory.

I imagine the administration who chose their mark to be between the eyes of the owl, had little trouble collecting taxes Grin

~Steve
Logged

areich
Tribunus Plebis Perpetuus
Procurator Monetae
Caesar
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8810



WWW
« Reply #240 on: August 24, 2011, 03:14:24 am »

But why did these authorities mark the coins according to this theory?
Logged

Lloyd Taylor
Guest
« Reply #241 on: August 24, 2011, 04:49:39 am »

But why did these authorities mark the coins according to this theory?

The answer to that lies in the Persian administrative system. Unfortunately the workings of the Persian administration are not documented in any depth. Any answer thus becomes even more speculative than the theory that the cuts reflect a form of administrative control. It probably serves well to remember that in many regions these cuts (and often heavily counter marked) coins are found the economy was far from fully monetized, so that the coins served little purpose other than for official transactions involving and between the economic and social elite and Persian administrative entities, with the coins acting as little more than silver bullion.  Such being the case the cuts could have served to track source and payment within the administration. In such capacity a specific cut could represent a warranty from a specific part of the administration as to the quality of the coin/silver with the implication that if something was found wanting, or there was a shortfall in payment, then blame/responsibility could be apportioned accordingly.

Van Alfen in his various papers on 'owls" has touched upon the subject of the role of such cuts and counter marks in the Persian realm. He has also suggested that in the early period of monetization of a region the cuts and counter marks may have served as "marks of ownership and guarantees of worth".

The interesting and relevant fact is that the cutting and extensive counter marking evident on owls that circulated in the Persian domain is not anywhere near as frequent, or extensive,  on later coinages (e.g. Alexanders) once this Persian domain fell under Greek influence and the control various Hellenistic Administrations following the conquests of Alexander.  This is suggestive of some sort of role for the cuts in the Persian administration of early monetized regions and a departure from this administrative practice under later Hellenistic control in what were eventually to become fully monetized economies.
Logged
Ghengis Jon
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 663



« Reply #242 on: August 24, 2011, 08:04:41 am »

That makes perfect sense in regards to countermarks.  But anyone with a flat piece of bronze and a rock could 'legitimize' coinage in their possesion.  Perhaps it worked in the opposite direction - cut coins were deemed of lesser purity?
Logged

Don't buy uncleaneds from ebay's ancientcoinman - 70% slugs and NO returns!
Lloyd Taylor
Guest
« Reply #243 on: August 24, 2011, 02:53:27 pm »

That makes perfect sense in regards to countermarks.  But anyone with a flat piece of bronze and a rock could 'legitimize' coinage in their possesion.  Perhaps it worked in the opposite direction - cut coins were deemed of lesser purity?

In the theory, the key is that these cuts served no purpose and held no significance for the populace at large, that existed in an essentially barter based economy. The cuts served a purpose for the Persian administration, which was far from being just an 'anybody'.  Think in terms of what are essentially bullion (weight based) settlements/transactions and payments between administrative entities and elites and you get a better picture of the possible accounting and administrative purpose these cuts might have served. The economy of the Persian east, removed from the Mediterranean coastal regions was essentially a non-monetized economy at the times these coins found their way into Persian treasury.  As monetization progressed cuts were probably replaced by counter marks which held significance for the broader populace and this occurred for the very reason you articulate, but this is a later development in the economic administration that accompanied more widespread usage of coinage.

The alternative is to think that the ancients were a bunch of clowns who didn't believe the evidence of their eyes when confronted with existing test cut(s) and then proceeded to further bash and slice a coin on each transaction.  Possible, but unlikely and if so it begs the question raised by Enodia to which the answer is thus stupidity.  I give the ancients more credit than the explanation of stupidity. An administrative purpose is far more probable in my opinion, even if we cannot be entirely specif as to what that purpose was, because of our ignorance of the matter.
Logged
Steve E
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


My favorite Forvm purchase, so far!


« Reply #244 on: August 24, 2011, 04:48:04 pm »

Lloyd,
Thats the best explanation of test cuts I've ever heard!
Thank You!

~Steve
Logged

Lloyd Taylor
Guest
« Reply #245 on: August 24, 2011, 05:54:06 pm »

Steve - thanks.

I forgot to mention another supporting fact for the administrative theory.  The cuts are not random.  Recognizable and consistent patters are evident e.g. between the eyes, across the owl's throat, etc. If the cuts were purely for testing the nature of the core of the coin, then a systematic pattern would not be observed. Rather greater randomness would prevail.  Another supporting fact is that the cuts were done in a way that essentially negated damage to the rest of the coin.  The example posted demonstrates this amply.  No deformation on the side opposite the cut.  If the aim were to simply test for the presence of a  silver core, then such care in testing/cutting would be unlikely.

The cuts on the posted coin, like those on so many others, have been carefully and systematically placed in a manner to minimize damage to the coin beyond the cut. This is more than testing for the presence of a silver core and speaks of an administrative function.
Logged
Reid Goldsborough
Procurator Caesaris
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 633



WWW
« Reply #246 on: August 24, 2011, 06:23:32 pm »

I'm going to have to disagree with this. The test cuts on Owls are random. Yes, many are on the reverse, and many of these split the owl's head or body, but I believe this is only because this is the thickest part of the coin, and the reverse is the concave side, both conditions leading to fewer cracked coins when hit with a hammer and chisel. But some Owls are test cut on the obverse, and some on the edge. The cuts were all crude, and some did in fact crack the coin or flatten the coin's other side. Further, countermarking as a technology existed in the East for 150 years, more or less, before mass Owls, the most frequently test cut, were initiated.

I believe multiple test cuts refers neither to a weirdly crude accounting system or to stupidity on the part of ancient peoples but to the high occurrence of counterfeiting in ancient times, which reached the point where some counterfeits were made of plated base metal with a test cut engraved in the die as a further attempt to fool. Just as merchants in the Far East during the 18th and 19th centuries chop-marked U.S. Trade dollars, Spanish-American Pillar dollars, and other silver trade coins multiple times to test their authenticity, not trusting these coins (sometimes as well to indicate who it was who did the authentication), I believe merchants in the Near East in ancient times test cut Owls for the same purpose, only more crudely since this was a much earlier time.
Logged

oldestcoins.reidgold.com
athenianowlcoins.reidgold.com
alexanderthegreatcoins.reidgold.com
medusacoins.reidgold.com
thracecoins.reidgold.com
Lloyd Taylor
Guest
« Reply #247 on: August 24, 2011, 06:59:48 pm »

As I said earlier, not every one agrees with the administration theory (actually its better referred to as a hypothesis).  

To each his own.
Logged
Reid Goldsborough
Procurator Caesaris
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 633



WWW
« Reply #248 on: August 24, 2011, 09:21:08 pm »

Congenial disagreement is nice.  Smiley Nice change too.
Logged

oldestcoins.reidgold.com
athenianowlcoins.reidgold.com
alexanderthegreatcoins.reidgold.com
medusacoins.reidgold.com
thracecoins.reidgold.com
Robert_Brenchley
Procurator Caesaris
Caesar
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7313

Honi soit qui mal y pense.


WWW
« Reply #249 on: August 25, 2011, 03:17:40 pm »

If you're right, the frequency of test cuts should vary with geographical location, and they should be commonest within the Persian territories of the time. Is there any evidence to suggest that this is the case?
Logged

Robert Brenchley

My gallery: http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/index.php?cat=10405
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 25 Go Up Print 
FORVM`s Classical Numismatics Discussion Board  |  Resources  |  Fake Coin Reports, Notorious Fake Sellers, and Discussions (Moderators: maridvnvm, Ilya Prokopov)  |  Topic: Badly Tooled Coins Here « previous next »
Jump to:  

Recent Price Reductions in Forum's Shop


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.282 seconds with 71 queries.