Dear Antonio, you make a very clear-cut statement here (and in a number of other posts) that the ancient people from
Iberia were Hebrews (or that they spoke/wrote Hebraic, does this make a difference?). You also state that these Hebrews were forged into a
Celtic people because of anti-semitic Nazi and Nazi-oriented propaganda. This propaganda would go back to at least 70 years ago. I would expect that in the last 70 years some sort of archaeological evidence other than monetary legends would come to light, supporting your statement that the ancient people from
Iberia were Hebrews. Can you mention any of this archaeological evidence? How can you combine the existence of a people of Hebraic origin in
Iberia in historical times (a PEOPLE, not just local communities that existed everywhere in the Mediterranean) with the lack of any literary source (Hebraic as well as non-Hebraic) mentioning a large-scale MIGRATION of Hebraic people from its historical seat in the Eastern Mediterranean to the Iberian Peninsula (and also other neighbouring region, if I understand correctly your hypothesis about coins from
Colonia Nemausus)? Also, as far as I remember Hebraic religion prohibits representation of human images. If these coins were produced by a
Jewish people, sharing, I suppose, the same religion with the Hebrews in the Middle East, how do you explain the presence of human
portraits on virtually EVERY coin that you consider to be produced by a Hebrew people? Please take into account that most likely the original Iberian
alphabet is linked to the Punic one, since Punic presence in
Iberia is very well documented long before these coins were reasonably produced. Punic means of Phoenician, i.e Semitic origin, so it is not strange that Iberian and Hebraic alphabets may share some similarity: they could have a close common origin. Apart from this, I am afraid the speculation about Iberian coins being really Hebraic coins is just that, your personal speculation. Could you possibly stop flooding the
forum? Thanks.
P.