Oh, I'm sure that the temple in question will always remain in the limbo, so to speak, where it's been. We have no foundations for it such as a permanent
stone building would require, we have no epigraphic or literary evidence for it, such as so-and-so having visited it or some else's having
restored or destroyed it, or mention of a cult by that name earlier. We do have the coins, with all their usual advantages and limitations (representations of
architecture by non-architects). The coins are certain. On the other hand, I do
not think we have to do a temple-simulacrum, such as the Argaeus-on-an-Altar may have been. The only reason I posted the old photo of the Palace of
Fine Arts in S.F. was as an example of full-size, truly architectural building that was built
just for an occasion. Now, we don't know that
Juno Marialis's
tempietto was one such, but we do know of arches and other structures built in
Rome for specific occasions that need not have been
aere perennius, and until we find a foundation or an
inscription for the
Juno Martialis, the plausible possibility of its having been one such cannot be precluded.
On the other hand,
mea culpa, I didn't check the
antoninianus at all carefully, and I am glad to have it pinned down. Besides, it would be painful to think of a
portrait die so bad as that one being 'rare'. I just got it for a document, just as at
Deultum we have both little coins with their Aphrodite and middle-bronze size ones with her in her temple. Common is just
fine.
Pat