Classical Numismatics Discussion Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 30, 2010, 09:02:45 am
Search Calendar Login Register

+  FORVM`s Classical Numismatics Discussion Board
|-+  Resources
| |-+  Identification Help (Moderators: Steve Minnoch, Varangian, casata137ec)
| | |-+  Constans GLOR-IA EXERC-ITVS (Stumped)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Constans GLOR-IA EXERC-ITVS (Stumped)  (Read 3772 times)
John the Chess Guy
Praetorian
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 77

Amici Sumus! We are friends!


WWW
« on: February 08, 2007, 09:18:58 am »

Hi Everyone:

This Constans AE4 (a little over 15mm) has me stumped.
It appears to be mis-struck. The obverse legend seems to
be CONST-ANS AVG, but I don't know what is going on in the
lower left hand corner - appears to be more lettering but may
just be a visual trick on my old, tired eyes...

The reverse legend is GLOR-IA EXERC-ITVS, 2 soldiers, 1 standard.

And then there is the exergue. Can the mint be determined?
Is it Alexandria? Another mint? Cannot be determined?

Any help anyone can give me would be most appreciated. I couldn't
find anything even close in the normal references. I suspect that I am
missing something simple on this one.

John



Logged

LM ANA 2342 / LM CSNS 337
SFC, US Army (Ret.) 1974-1994
Jeremy W
Caesar
*****
Online Online

Posts: 462



WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2007, 09:28:28 am »

I don't know about the mint but the coin seems to be double struck or was struck on a previously struck flan.

Jeremy


Added:  Not that what looks like a mint mark is really ITVS of the double strike.  I don't see any letters of a mint.

Logged
John the Chess Guy
Praetorian
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 77

Amici Sumus! We are friends!


WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2007, 10:47:52 am »

I don't know about the mint but the coin seems to be double struck or was struck on a previously struck flan.

Jeremy


Added:  Not that what looks like a mint mark is really ITVS of the double strike.  I don't see any letters of a mint.



Thanks, Jeremy. The one thing I did not do is rotate the reverse in order to see that that which is located in the exergue is instead doubling of the legend. That helps me out a lot.

I still wonder what happened on the obverse though. If one were describing this coin, would it be appropriate to say, "mis-struck on obverse, double-struck on reverse?" or how would one go about describing it?

John
Logged

LM ANA 2342 / LM CSNS 337
SFC, US Army (Ret.) 1974-1994
curtislclay
Tribunus Plebis Perpetuus
Procurator Monetae
Caesar
*****
Online Online

Posts: 6335



« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2007, 11:40:12 am »

I'd say doublestruck on both sides, with considerable rotation of the flan between the two strikes.

The ONST below the bust is from CONST of the first strike.  From the second strike only NST survive of the same letters, at 9-10 o'cl.  Note the two pearls at the ends of the wreath ties surviving from both strikes, one almost hitting the second upright of the N, the second some distance below the first upright of that letter.  Just above the T from the first strike a bit of the back of the emperor's head with lines indicating his hair can also be seen.
Logged

Curtis Clay
John the Chess Guy
Praetorian
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 77

Amici Sumus! We are friends!


WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2007, 11:49:19 am »

Thank you, Curtis. That all makes perfect sense to me now, and I appreciate the knowledge I have gained today!

John
Logged

LM ANA 2342 / LM CSNS 337
SFC, US Army (Ret.) 1974-1994
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 9.826 seconds with 19 queries.