Odd deanummia. In appearance it is a typical Justinian, CON, but regnal year is difficult to determine, but year II is unreal for this
type. The main thing is that for Justinian decanummi such a short
legend like this is not typical. If this is
Justin II early deca, then such deanummies are known for the year 1 only, not II. Probably, in the date XXXII
part XXX is weak struck. But it is likely that this can also be an imitation. Coin was found in the
hoard of
byzantine and late
roman small change.
