Dear
Lawrence C., Walter, and Board,
There is a
fair amount of evidence to suggest that certain
Roman provincial issues did in fact circulate (in
antiquity) long distances from their place of issue. The reasons seem to differ in many cases.
Walter indicated one famously perplexing example that has popularly been attributed to some of the soldiers that
Caracalla brought with him during
his Eastern campaigns. Peloponnesian
provincials, for instance, have been found in eastern
Turkey,
Syria,
Israel, Jordan, etc. Even so, I find the eastern campaign explanation unsatisfactory and am currently exploring an alternative possibility.
Then there is the intriguing
Sardis series of
countermarks applied to a bewildering amount of
Roman provincial coins issued far from
Sardis. Here is my
countermarked example:
https://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pos=-49985I believe Ann
Johnston provided some coverage on these marks in her
magnum opus,
Greek Imperial Denominations, ca.200-275: A Study of the Roman Provincial Bronze Coinages of Asia Minor (2007). Even so, I feel the implications of this whole monetary situation have gone largely underappreciated by researchers.
Lawrence's post seems to suggest that he is already aware of the wide distribution of certain Alexandrian coins struck during the
Roman period. In any case, this phenomenon is real, with late
potin issues occasionally turning up in places as far away from
Egypt as
Britain. Again, I have a theory about what happened, but
had thought at some point that Michel
Amandry already came to the same tentative conclusion in a paper he wrote, one which I cannot seem to find right now... Maybe I was mistaken. In any event, I feel that during the
complete changeover to
Roman imperial coin production in the
Roman provinces, Alexandrian potins were allowed to circulate as
Roman imperial issues also.
Hope some of this helps.
Best regards,
Mark Fox
Michigan