FORVM`s Classical Numismatics Discussion Board
Numismatic and History Discussion Forums => Roman Provincial Coins Discussion Forum => Topic started by: okidoki on May 06, 2018, 11:45:05 am
-
Dear cf,
I do not know what ΟΜΟΝΟΙΑ means in the legend Homonoia I know
Coin is very similar to this one http://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/4/15080/
Reference.
RPC III--; Emmett--; Dattari--; Köln--
Issue L E = year 5
Obv. ΑΥΤ ΚΑΙС ΤΡΑΙΑΝ ΑΔΡΙΑΝΟС СƐΒ
Laureate draped and cuirassed bust of Hadrian, r., seen from rear
Rev. L E ΟΜΟΝΟΙΑ
Clasped hands
7.14 gr
23.5 mm
12h
https://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pos=-146127
-
Interesting, but mysterious: what event of 120/121 AD could your coin be referring to?
Vogt supposes that the similar type for L. Verus in 164/5 (your link) commemorates his marriage to Lucilla, which took place "in the middle of the Parthian War" according to the vita Marci.
-
Curtis, thank you for sharing your ideas
i did not know that clasping does/can depict an event
-
i updated the dimensions.
7.14 gr
23.5 mm
12h
Dottend circle about 18-19 mm
Flan shape like a Alexandrian bronze (only less thickness)
No casting line/seam
but no usual cracks in the edge one often sees on egypt bronzes but not always and more on the bigger ones
-
I will return it.
I think this is a forgery, with the coin in hand the rim is a bit of it’s not the usual Egypt bronze, combined with the portrait, which is very like Hadrian is a later style (year 9 on and more likely year 16 on)
A year 5 portrait would not look much like Hadrian and would be a head type, with drapery (or aegis).
there is also no trace of the N from LEN year 9 what could explain the obverse bust and legend with fits into year 9
The back view detail is not well done so very likely not created from a tetradrachm, but it could be from a diobol but a year 16 on one. Even late date diobols often have a head type portrait.
The reverse OMONOIA inscription with LE, along with 2 hands shaking is very common for the Aurelius family tetradrachms and this is the likely source of the reverse design.
I think it is a forgery simply because the obverse details do not match the reverse details.
A strange forgery, maybe 100 years old
-
I also think the appearance is odd, and suspicious.
-
the seller states is was a detect find