Classical Numismatics Discussion
  Welcome Guest. Please login or register. All Items Purchased From Forum Ancient Coins Are Guaranteed Authentic For Eternity!!! Explore Our Website And Find Joy In The History, Numismatics, Art, Mythology, And Geography Of Coins!!! Expert Authentication - Accurate Descriptions - Reasonable Prices - Coins From Under $10 To Museum Quality Rarities Welcome Guest. Please login or register. Internet challenged? We Are Happy To Take Your Order Over The Phone 252-646-1958 Explore Our Website And Find Joy In The History, Numismatics, Art, Mythology, And Geography Of Coins!!! Support Our Efforts To Serve The Classical Numismatics Community - Shop At Forum Ancient Coins

New & Reduced


Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
My latest arrivals include this Valentinian II solidus. I question the attribution to RIC IX 69a by the auctioneer and the prior attribution to RIC IX 46c2 on a prior dealer tag that was included with the lot. 

Auction description:
Valentinian II, Western Roman Empire (AD 375-392). AV solidus (20mm, 4.46 gm, 6h). Constantinople, 8th officina, 25 August AD 383-28 August AD 388. D N VALENTINI-ANVS P F AVG, pearl-diademed, draped, and cuirassed bust of Valentinian II right, seen from front / CONCORDI-A AVGGG H, Constantinopolis seated facing on throne, helmeted head right, right foot on prow, grounded scepter in right hand, globe in outstretched left hand; CONOB in exergue. RIC IX 69a.

There may be two errors of fact going on: (1) The pearl diadem may have a rosette on the obverse bust. (2) The throne may be ornamented with lions heads.  Tell me if you agree.

That said, getting the correct attribution is not so easy. Using RIC IX is sweet sorrow, with its myriad codes, references to other entries, and scant photographs. I narrowed down the choices by the usual diagnostic elements. Mint > Periods > Obverse Legend (naming emperor) > Metal > Denomination > and (b) reverse type, legends, officinas, and mint-mark.

Valentinian II only appears in period III, IV, V, and VI (375-392 AD), but no coins were attributed to him in period III and no gold coins in VI, leaving only period IV and V. For period IV, the obverse legend D N VALENTINI-ANVS P F AVG matches code (2c). The rosette-diademed bust matches code (B). The reverse legend CONCORDI-A AVGGG H and type matches #46(d)2, presuming the lion heads throne. That’s not a million miles away from the earlier attribution to 46(c)2, which does not capture the rosette diadem, but does recognize the lion heads on the throne. The auction attribution to RIC IX 69(a) doesn’t capture the lion heads or the rosette. So am I mistaking the pearl diadem for the rosette (which includes the two strands of pears)?
2
History and Archeology / Re: Archaeological News
« Last post by Xenophon on Today at 08:34:35 am »
Couple renovating kitchen find hoard of English Civil War coins.
A couple renovating the kitchen of a 17th-century cottage found a £35,000 coin hoard hidden under the floor.

Betty and Robert Fooks had recently bought the property and were carrying out work to remove the kitchen’s concrete floor to create more ceiling height.

Mr Fooks dug down 2ft with a pickaxe by torchlight and unearthed a smashed glazed pottery bowl full to the brim with 400-year-old coins.

The agricultural engineer counted 1,029 of the coins, including King James I and King Charles I gold pieces.

The hoard is believed to have been buried for safekeeping between 1642 and 1644 during the English Civil War.

The couple reported the discovery to local officials and the collection was then sent to the British Museum for cleaning and identification.

The coins are now coming up for sale at Duke’s Auctioneers in Dorchester, Dorset.

The country cottage is part of a smallholding at South Poorton Farm, in a hamlet near Bridport, Dorset.

Mrs Fooks, a 43-year-old NHS health visitor, said: “It is a 400-year-old house so there was lots of work to do.

“We were taking all the floors and ceilings out and took it back to its stone walls.

“We decided to lower the ground floor to give us more ceiling height.

“One evening, I was with the children and my husband was digging with a pickaxe when he called to say they’ve found something. He put all the coins in a bucket and brought them home to me.”

She added: “If we hadn’t lowered the floor they would still be hidden there. It is amazing and fascinating.

“I presume they were buried during the English Civil War and the person intended to retrieve them but never got the chance.”

The hoard, which was discovered in October 2019, also contained Elizabeth I, Philip and Mary silver shillings and sixpences.

The most valuable coins are a James I gold laurel coin and a Charles I gold unite coin dating from the 1620s, which are both tipped to fetch £2,000.

The hoard has been split into almost 100 lots by Duke’s Auctioneers.

Julian Smith, a specialist at the auctioneers, said: “The coins have been with the British Museum for identification and cleaning, and they feel the coins were deposited on one occasion around 1642-4.”

The sale takes place on April 23.

3
Ancient and Medieval Coin Identification Help / 2 Mangir for ID
« Last post by Giba L on Today at 07:56:49 am »
10-12mm ,  0.70/1gr
4
Seals and Tesserae / Re: Identification of Byzantine lead seal?
« Last post by djmacdo on Today at 07:54:22 am »
Thank you for this information--it will make my friend very pleased indeed!
5
Fake Coins and Notorious Fake Sellers / Re: Annia Faustina
« Last post by Ron C2 on Today at 06:30:58 am »
I suspect it’s not authentic. All those coins have what looks like identical fake green patina, and if it were a real AF, the account would be in a marquis auction by itself.

The last one sold in 2009 for $62,500.

6
II really like barbaric copies of ancient coins, so I thought it was a copy.  I assume that imitations were also made in those eras.
7
There is no better explanation than this, thank you very much.
8
Hi carpatic,

Not an easy ask ;D, the Aradian era date is barely visible but i can confidently place your coin to between 137-134 B.C or Aradian years 123-125. Your coins iconographic details also suggest the dates i have mentioned.

Hope this helps.

Arados
9
Thanks for the new pictures, Giba!
These are much better. Now I see it is a bracteate, struck one-sided on a very thin flan. What one sees on the reverse is the mirrored obverse.
I wonder if this is a genuine coin. It may be just belly money, which dancers attach to their clothing.
I'll see if I can find any genuine bracteate Ottoman coinage.
10
This is why:
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
All coins are guaranteed for eternity